This is required reading to understand the world in which we live. The Protocols exhibit a pathological hatred for non-Jews, and a desire to undermine and exploit them. The Protocols were part of an “initiation” for 33 degree Masonic Jews. Most Jews are unaware of this agenda and therefore are easily manipulated. “Anti-Semitism is indispensable to us in the management of our lesser brethren.” (Protocol 9)
[Cf. Protocol Two- “Think carefully of the successes we arranged for Darwinism, Marxism, Nietzchism. To us Jews, at any rate, it should be plain to see what a disintegrating effect these directives have had upon the minds of the goyim.”]
“We shall abolish every kind of freedom of instruction… teachers will read what will pass as free lectures… These theories will be raised by us to the stage of a dogma of faith as a transitional stage towards our faith.”
“We have long past taken care to discredit the priesthood of the goyim, and thereby to ruin their mission on earth, which in these days might still be a great hindrance to us… As to other religions, we shall still have less difficulty in dealing with them…” (Thinking sexual abuse by Catholic priests?)
“Just as nowadays our brethren [i.e. Jews] are obliged at their own risk to denounce to the kahal [Jewish council] apostates of their own family… so in our kingdom over all the world it will be obligatory for all our subjects to observe the duty of service to the State…” (Thinking KGB, Stazi or Gestapo?)
“…we have broken the prestige of the goy kings by frequent attempts upon their lives through our agents, blind sheep of our flock, who are easily moved by a few liberal phrases to crimes provided only they be painted in political colors. We have compelled the rulers to acknowledge their weakness in advertising overt measures of secret defence and therefore we shall bring authority to destruction.”
This deals with the “financial programme” the “crowning and decisive point of our plans.” The author’s expertise in these matters suggests he is a banker. “When we come into our kingdom our autocratic kingdom will avoid… burdening the masses with taxes remembering that it plays the part of father and protector.”
A progressive capital tax will be introduced. “A tax increasing in the percentage of ratio to capital will give a much larger revenue than the present individual or property tax, which is useful to us now for the sole reason that it excites trouble and discontent among the goyim.”
“The gold standard has been the ruin of the States which adopted it, for it has not been able to satisfy the demands for money, the more so that we have removed gold from circulation as far as possible.”
“Our Order will be the crown of order, and in that is included the whole happiness of man. The aureole of this authority will inspire a mystical bowing of the knee and a reverent fear before it of all peoples. True force makes no terms with any right, not even with that of God: none dare come near to it so as to take so much as a span away from it.”
There are many nostrums like: “Unemployment is a most perilous thing for a government. For us its part will have been played out the moment authority is transferred into our hands. Drunkenness will also be prohibited by law…”
“The king of the Jews must not be at the mercy of his passions… the holy seed of David must sacrifice to his people all personal inclinations. Our supreme lord must be of exemplary irreproachability.” “Signed by the representatives of Zion, of the 33rd degree.”
Jewish apologists claim that the Protocols of Zion
were a direct plagiarism of this book published in 1864.
However, this universally-accepted claim
does not withstand scrutiny.
by Henry Makow Ph.D.
Next to the Bible The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is perhaps the mostly widely read book in the world.
Published in Russia in 1903, it purports to be the leaked master plan for “Jewish world domination.” It is the kind of thing that would be studied at secret workshops of an occult society.
In different ways, both Zionists and Nazis have made it synonymous with virulent anti Semitism and genocide.
But surely Jews should not be blamed for the machinations of a tiny secret society. The vast majority of Jews would disavow this master plan if they believed it existed.
Surely one can condemn all racism and genocide in the strongest possible terms and still believe theProtocols are authentic.
In my opinion, the equation with anti Semitism is really a ploy to divert attention away from this master plan.
The plagiarism claim is part of a propaganda campaign waged by conscious and unconscious collaborators in academia and the media.
THE FORGERY CLAIM
We are told that The Protocols of Zion is a hoax, a “proven forgery” concocted by the Tsarist Political Police (the Okhrana) to incite anti Semitism and discredit revolutionaries.
But the “proof” is far from convincing.
It consists of three articles published in The London Times (August 16-18, 1921) by Philip Graves.
According to Graves, Protocols is a crude, chapter-by-chapter plagiarism of Maurice Joly’s Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu (1864).
It was easy to make this claim while Joly’s book was unavailable. Napoleon III’s police confiscated it as soon as it was published.
But it is available now and I invite you to compare the two texts. In my opinion, they are entirely different in tone, content and purpose. At 140 pages,Dialogues is twice as long as Protocols. Most of it finds no echo in theProtocols.
The crux of Graves’ argument is that certain references and passages inProtocols were lifted from Dialogues. He claims there are 50 of these and produces about a dozen.
Their striking resemblance to Protocols leaves little doubt that the author did refer to the Dialogues as part of his research. He had no compunction about borrowing or reshaping a few passages that struck his fancy.
Indeed Philip Graves is “struck by the absence of any effort on the part of the plagiarist to conceal his plagiarisms.”
That’s because he had nothing to hide.
He was not Graves’ “unimportant precis-writer employed by the court or by the Okhrana” to construct a hoax.
He was a diabolical genius crafting an original work. It is simplistic and disingenuous to characterizeProtocols as a hoax.
Graves’ article smacks of a Zionist propaganda operation. Graves “expose” of Protocols appeared in August 1921 when Zionists were pressing the League of Nations to turn Palestine into a Jewish homeland under British Mandate.
Philip Graves tells the unlikely story that a “Mr. X” brought the Dialogues to him in Constantinople where he was the Times’ correspondent. Mr. X presented it as “irrefutable proof” that the Protocols are a plagiarism.
Mr. X was a White Russian, which seems incredible given the Jewish role in the Bolshevik Revolution. He claims he bought the book from, get this, “a former member of the Okhrana” who had fled to Constantinople.
In The Controversy of Zion, (Chapter 34) Douglas Reed, a Times‘ staffer at the time, provides additional background.
In May 1920, Lord Northcliffe, a part owner of The Times, printed an article about the Protocolsentitled “The Jewish Peril, A Disturbing Pamphlet, A Call for an Enquiry. ” It concluded:
“An impartial investigation of these would-be documents and their history is most desirable…are we to dismiss the whole matter without inquiry and to let the influence of such a book as this work unchecked?”
Then in May 1922 Northcliffe visited Palestine and wrote that Britain had been too hasty to promise it to the Jewish people when in fact it belonged to 700,000 Muslim Arab residents.
Mr. Wickham Steed, the editor of The Times of London in 1921 refused to print the article and Northcliffe tried to get him fired.
Somehow Steed was able to have Northcliffe declared “insane” and committed. Later Northcliffe complained he was being poisoned and died suddenly in 1922.
Douglas Reed was Northcliffe’s secretary but didn’t learn of these events until they appeared in theOfficial History of the Times in the 1950’s.
Clearly Northcliffe had offended some “big boys” when he opposed the British Mandate in Palestine. Why was it so important?
Israel is intended to be the capital of the Masonic World Government. They are already constructing the infrastructure. See “The Roots of Evil in Jerusalem.”
THE FORGERY CLAIM IN MORE DETAIL
Philip Graves and the other apologists are incorrect to claim theProtocols plagiarize the Dialogues chapter by chapter.
Graves writes that “the Seventh Dialogue…corresponds with the fifth, sixth, seventh and part of the eighth Protocol. ”
At eight pages, these Protocols are twice as long as the Seventh Dialogue.
They mostly contain material not in the Seventh Dialogue, or anywhere else. I will list a few examples from Protocol Five alone.
Protocol Five says “our kingdom will be distinguished by a despotism of such magnificent proportions” that it will “wipe out any goyim who oppose us by deed or word.”
In contrast Seventh Dialogue says, “Death, expropriation and torture should only play a minor role in the internal politics of modern states.”
Protocols Five says we “robbed [the goyim] of their faith in God” and “insinuated into their minds the conception of their own rights” thereby undermining the authority of Kings. There is nothing comparable in Dialogue Seven.
Protocol Five says, “we shall so wear down the goyim that they will be compelled to offer us international power [allowing us] gradually to absorb all State forces of the world and to form a Super-Government.” There is nothing comparable in Dialogue Seven.
Protocol Five says the “engine” of all states is “in our hands” and that engine is “Gold.” “We were chosen by God Himself to rule over the whole earth.” There is nothing comparable in Dialogue Seven.
ON THE OTHER HAND
The author of Protocols does select a few passages or references from Dialogues that appear unaltered (see Graves) or in different form.
For example, the Dialogues‘ say: ” Everywhere might precedes right. Political liberty is merely a relative idea. The need to live is what dominates states as it does individuals.”
In Protocols this becomes, “From the law of nature right lies in might. Political freedom is an idea but not a fact, and one must know how to use it [political freedom] as a bait whenever it appears necessary to attract the masses … to one’s party for the purpose of crushing another who is in authority.” (Protocols 1)
Graves leaves out the last part to make the resemblance seem greater than it is.
Dialogues (7) say, “Revolutionary ferment which is suppressed in one’s own country should be incited throughout Europe.”
In Protocols (7) “Throughout all Europe … we must create ferments, discords, hostilities.” There is no reference to suppressing these in one’s own country.
The author of Protocols is not a forger creating a hoax, but a conspirator forging an original work.
SAME GENRE, DIFFERENT CONCEPTIONS
Both books belong to the “immoral school” of political theory. Machiavelli pays homage to a long list of rulers “who are progenitors of my doctrine.” Both preach might makes right, “good” comes from evil, and the end justifies the means.
But the similarity ends there. The tone of the Dialogues is dry and theoretical. It is a debate between fictional political theorists: Montesquieu, a champion of democracy and Machiavelli, a champion of tyranny. Dialogues is considered a critique of the reign of Napoleon III.
Montesquieu asks how to quell the spirit of anarchy in society. Machiavelli prescribes a “monster called the state” which maintains a democratic artifice but is actually controlled by the “Prince.” He talks about how to suppress secret societies.
On the other hand, the tone of Protocols is frankly conspiratorial and subversive and pays homage to Lucifer. Protocols is a “strategic plan from which we cannot deviate without running the risk of seeing the labour of many centuries come to naught.” (Protocol 1)
We are struck by a sense of relevance when reading Protocols. We immediately recognize its baneful influence in today’s world. Here is a synopsis. See also “Did Rothschild Write The Protocols of Zion?” “Protocols is the NWO Blueprint” and “Protocols Dominates Our Culture” .
Since Graves’ articles, there have been a few books arguing the “forgery” thesis. The latest isNorman Cohn, Warrant for Genocide (1970).
Graves and Cohn admit that “the Financial Programme” (Protocols 20-24) which the author calls “the crowning and decisive point of our plans” is largely original.
For serious researchers, Australian researcher Peter Myers presents pro and con views.
Goebbels said that propaganda is effective only when the reader doesn’t realize it is propaganda. It follows that dupes write the best propaganda.
One hundred million people were slaughtered in the last century but no one considers the possibility that the human race might have been subverted.
War is hell but no one thinks Satan worshipers might be behind it.
I suspect the Second World War was a battle for racial superiority between Jewish and Aryan wings of the Illuminati who in fact are united at the top.
The private central bankers of England, the U.S. and Nazi Germany made the war possible. They worked as one at the Bank of International Settlements in Switzerland. (See Charles Higham, Trading With the Enemy.)
The purpose of the war was to degrade, defraud and demoralize humanity. The Holocaust provided a rationale for the establishment of Israel as headquarters of the New World Order. Aryans, Jews and many others were sacrificed and exploited.
In my opinion, the outlawing of Protocols on pain of death in Bolshevik Russia and its execration in the West today proves its authenticity.
Mankind is in the grip of a diabolical conspiracy. In order to make good people do bad things, truth must be tailored to fit the political purpose. This is Communist and feminist teaching.
I would like to be proven wrong, but in the case of Protocols, the “forgery” argument is propaganda.
Updated from Dec 14, 2003
July 15, 2017
“Speaking of Jewish conspiracies without discussing magic and occult powers is like talking about the dangers posed by snakes without mentioning venom and its effects on the human body, or talking about plagues without talking about germs.”
Francis, a white voodoo adept, has contributed many articles to this site.
The reality about Jews and Zionists is one hundred times worse than described by the Protocols. The Protocols, though true as to most of what they describe, are a gross understatement of what has been happening, as Jules Verne who saw many modern things coming but not for instance the atomic bomb. The real thing is just too monstrous not to get mad writing about it.
Here are some of the grave understatements about the Protocols :
1) No mention at all is made of black magic and sorcery, which is the real main thing about the Jewish phenomenon, of which debt finance and usury are but one iceberg tip.
Judaism is not a mere inverted image of Christianity as we know it, nor a brand of Christianity reserved for a happy few. This description applies more for Calvinism, which is Christianity as Jews like to pervert and manipulate it, but not the real thing they keep for themselves and for the witches and warlocks in general.
Speaking of Jewish conspiracies without discussing magic and occult powers is like talking about the dangers posed by snakes without mentioning venom and its effects on the human body, or talking about plagues without talking about germs.
3) No mention is made of child sacrifice, which is as central to the Jewish phenomenon as eucharist is central to traditional Christianity, and without which no decisive political move whatsoever can be accomplished by the Jewish entity, hence the most serious sanctions that have been made into law in the whole modern world as regards « blood libel », even far more serious than those to be inflicted upon Holocaust deniers. Acknowledging Jewish ritual child murder is far more important to discuss than denying the sacredness of Holocaust if humanity is to come out of such a grip.
4) No mention is made by the Protocols of the technological advances the Jews benefit from especially as regards media and electronics. The world the protocols describe mention technologies that never seem go beyond 1870 France or 1910 Russia. Instant communication planet-wide is not mentioned. Even cinema goes unmentioned despite the fact it was already invented as the book was published and would serve Jewry so decisively though Hollywood and other institutions.
5) The book makes no special mention of the US, despite the fact you must acknowledge the US founding fathers were all Zionists, despite the fact the country was explicitly founded as New World’s Israel to be built as a tool for the rebuilding of Old World’s Israel proper : the doctrine of American Manifest Destiny, already outlined throughout Francis Bacon’s works.
6) As regards Russia which was to be inflicted another Jewish-led and Zionist-inspired government capable of seducing the world through its lies, that is a serious omission. The Protocols are written as if the main scene of their misdeeds would never cease to be Europe. No mention is made of the fact they would do their best to move their financial capitals out of Europe and later on out of the White races, [which] they would try to diminish in numbers and rank through miscegenation and sterilization.
7) The book makes no mention of the state of Israel (even though it mentions the King of the Jews) nor of the Muslims as a force of paramount importance : you’ve got the impression such a future King of the Jews would reign from Poland or Lithuania. That is a very gross omission because Albert Pike during the War of American Secession had already foreseen the future importance Islam would have to exhaust the West into oblivion.
8) No mention is made of climate control : the higher rank Jews have always been awful experts at it. All revolutions of the past happened through control of the climate as well as of the money supply.
9) No mention is made of direct crowd control through infra-sound used as a weapon, a thing that can be operated with mere drums if you know how.
10) No mention is made neither of the very troublesome relation between Jews and the Black African world, which goes far beyond mere Jewish implication in Black slavery.
11) No mention is made of the counter-hierarchy of witchcraft in the whole world as being directed by Jews and as being the Jews’ eternal main relay to keep humanity down.
12) Very little mention is made by the Protocols of feminism apart from the trivial aspect of demoralization of peoples through immorality and debauchery. The reality is that all occult sciences are from time immemorial under centralized control and that Jewry naturally arises as the capacity to perform them becomes an inherited trait.
13) The magical mechanism beneath debt money is never discussed, only legal indebtedness is mentioned. That is perfectly ridiculous for in the absence of such a magical mechanism military revolt against debtors would be very easy.
14) No mention is made of the fact that the Western Roman Empire crumbled under Jewish influence and that the dark ages that would follow were a time where they felt most triumphant, not forced into underground as official history loves to say.
15) No mention is made neither of India, despite the fact the East India Company had been a Jewish company, not an English one, despite also the fact that two chapters of the Protocols too clearly seem to be a mere copy of passages of Sri Kautilya’s Arthashastra (the Hindu treatise of Geopolitical Science, making Machiavelli proper look like a choir boy in comparison) to the point of mentioning the Hindu God Vishnu.
The Protocols are genuine but in a very second-hand way. The real conspiracy is just too monstrous to be described by such a book.
Note on Judaism-
One of the main mistakes is supposing that Judaism is a philosophy of both history and progress, like most well-known Christian cosmogonies, as opposed to cyclical views of history as are more characteristic of pagan systems. This is wrong : historical time is as fiercely devalued in Judaism and in the general Jewish mentality in general as it may be in traditional India.
Actually the mentality closest to real Judaism is the late Indian one indeed : there is no progress to expect for the world as it is subject to eternal laws and to no such thing as redemption, there is a progress only for those individuals who learn to learn and use its laws at their own advantage. There is no such thing as historical time for the pious Jew : when for instance the Pessach happened, all Jewish souls past, present and to come were attending by the mount of Horeb.
The Torah read in the real traditional Jewish way is NOT a book of History, but a book of cartoon-like stories, conceived as recurrent throughout all space and time. And it has to be read as a book of secrets so as to grow your ability to use the laws of the world at your own technical advantage.
There is no such thing as historical hope, you have to develop your own cunning if you don’t want to end up among the eternal losers. It is a system of magic made into a faith. The Jews thus conceived rather tend to believe not that they will be in full power over the rest one day, but that they alone have always been in full control of everything in the universe and that by original divine design no single thing outside their authority has ever had any efficacious will of its own, the only problem being that most Jewish individuals haven’t yet developed the practical qualities and capabilities to be admitted among the hidden decision-makers.
To have a glimpse of that mentality, please refer to Wachovsky’s last episode of Matrix Trilogy, which unfortunately is very anticlimactic from an artistic point of view. The ultimate lesson is that time is by itself both evil and illusory; there is no salvation for the one still acting within its confines.