PLOT TO CONTROL UK

JEWISH PLOT TO CONTROL UK


Lord Rothschild and Boris Johnson.

There are as many different types of Jew as there are different types of Italian.

The Kosher Nostra Jews are fans of Leo Strauss, who believed that “an elite should use deception, religious fervor and perpetual war to control the credulous population.”

The Israelification of British and American society..

Most of the Jews I have known are lovely, friendly, decent people.

THE GAY FATHER OF NAZISM AND ZIONISM.

British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli wrote about an alliance of aristocratic ‘Anglo-Saxons’ and aristocratic ‘Jews’ ruling the world.

“There is one man who can properly be regarded as the father of Zionism and Nazism: Benjamin Disraeli.

“Disraeli called for an Aryan-Semitic alliance to form an organized superior ‘Caucasian race’ that was destined to rule the world…”

How Britain’s Biggest Racists Created Zionism by Mark Burdman

“In 1877, the British Prime Minister, Disraeli, wrote a blueprint for a Zionist state in Palestine under British rule.”

How Britain’s Biggest Racists Created Zionism

Osama bin Laden at Oxford (on the right). The crypto-Jew Osama bin Laden lived for a time in London. ‘Bin Laden was the financier and logistics expert for the CIA’s fighters in Afghanistan. Bin Laden made commission on transactions, and this money was laundered by the Jewish Russian Mafia.’ Drugs, Oil, and War

The Jews are reported to have arrived in England in 1066 with William the Conqueror.

According to From Domesday Book to Magna Carta (1951):

(The Edict of Expulsion of 1290, expelling the Jews from England):

“As usurers … they had gained a strangle-hold on the recently founded monastic houses whose splendid buildings they had financed, and on many of the smaller aristocratic families…”

Allegedly, Jews took part in the ritual murder of Christian children. 

(Jews expelled from England)


Sir Leon Brittan, a Lithuanian Jew, who was in charge of MI5.

Officially, the Jews were expelled from England in 1290 in the reign of King Edward I.

However, there is evidence of an established Jewish community in London after 1290.
(Oliver Cromwell – Cromwell and the Jews)


Robert Cecil – King James I’s spy master

According to Dr John Coleman: “The Jewish Cecil family … had controlled the British monarchy since a Cecil became the private secretary and lover of Queen Elizabeth.” 

The Jewish Lord Cecil organised the Gunpowder Plot, the false flag involving Guy Fawkes.

FRAMED .

Officially, the Jews were readmitted in 1656 by Cromwell.

The Amsterdam based Rabbi, Menasseh ben Israel, is credited with organising this.

Reportedly, in 1656, Cromwell let 300 Jews return.

In the late 19th century, there was mass immigration of Jews from Eastern Europe.


Ramsay 

The UK’s Archibald Ramsay was an ‘extreme’ right wing opponent of ‘Jewish’ communism and the alleged Jewish campaign for world domination. 

In the 1930s, Ramsay was allied with those top people who were fans of Franco in Spain and Hitler in Germany.

Apparently, Ramsay did not realise that the top Nazis were Jewish.
THE ROTHSCHILD CABAL – NAZIS, COMMUNISTS

The members of the Establishment who were opposed to Ramsay included influential communists and Jews.


Lord Victor Rothschild … made Churchill’s decisions, including the bombing of the food trains into the concentration camps, and the continued strafing of the inmates. Rothschild is on record as saying: ‘There will be no room in the new country for shnorrers’ (poor Jews).” The Truth Seeker – The Biggest Secret of World War II

The Nazi Jews are said to have put the shnorrers into concentration camps.

(HITLER’S JEWISH NAZIS – PART 1 / HITLER’S JEWISH NAZIS – PART 2 )


Cromwell 

Ramsay believed that alleged Jewish manipulation of the British Establishment dated back at least to the time of Oliver Cromwell.

According to Archibald Ramsay, in his 1952 book “The Nameless War,” Oliver Cromwell acted as a paid agent of certain Jews who conspired with him to topple King Charles I.

According to an article, based on Ramsay’s book, entitled: ‘How the Jews stole Britain’ (Cached): 

When Charles I was in dispute with Parliament, a Jewish ‘Money-Baron’ in Holland, named Manasseh Ben Israel, had his agents contact Oliver Cromwell.

They offered him large sums of money if he would overthrow the British monarchy.

Manasseh Ben Israel, and other German and French moneylenders, financed Cromwell.

Manasseh Ben Israel 
Fernandez Carvajal of Portugal, often referred to as The Great Jew, became Cromwell’s Chief Military Contractor.

( There is said to be a cousinhood which includes the Montefiore/Carvajal, Rothschild, Rockefeller, Oppenheimer, Goldsmid, Sassoon, Warburg, Samuel, Franklin, Stern, Cohen, Schiff, Morgan, and Lazard families. MONTEFIORE FAMILY / THE GLOBALISTS – The Global Elite.)

The head of ‘the Jewish underground’ in England at that time was a Jew named De Souze, who became Portuguese Ambassador to England.

The Jewish plotters introduced Calvinism into England to split Church and State, and divide the people.


Calvin

Calvinism is of Jewish origin.
Calvin’s real name was Cohen. 
When he went from Geneva to France he became known as Cauin. Then in England it became Calvin.

At the B’nai B’rith celebrations held in Paris, France, in 1936, Calvin, was enthusiastically acclaimed to have been of Jewish descent.

The Jews organized armed mobs to aggravate every situation.

Isaac Disraeli, 1766- 1848, father of Benjamin Disraeli, refers to this in his ‘The Life of Charles II’.

He remarks that he obtained information from the records of Melchior de Salem, a Jew, who was French Envoy to the British Government at that time.

Disraeli draws attention to the similarity between the British and the French revolutions.


Cromwell 

Lord Alfred Douglas edited a weekly review called Plain English.

In an article, in the issue of 3 September 1921, he explained how his friend, L.D. Van Valckert of Amsterdam, had come into possession of a volume of records of the Synagogue of Muljeim.
One entry, dated 16 June 1647 reads : From O.C. (i.e. Oliver Cromwell) to Ebenezer Pratt.

“In return for financial support will advocate admission of Jews to England. This however impossible while Charles living.

“Charles cannot be executed without trial, adequate grounds for which do not at present exist.

“Therefore advise that Charles be assassinated, but will have nothing to do with arrangements for procuring an assassin, though willing to help in his escape.”

In reply to this dispatch the records show E. Pratt wrote a letter dated July 12th, 1647 addressed to Oliver Cromwell.

“Will grant financial aid as soon as Charles removed, and Jews admitted.

“Assassination too dangerous.

“Charles should be given an opportunity to escape.

“His recapture will then make trial and execution possible. The support will be liberal, but useless to discuss terms until trial commences.”


Charles I 

On November 12th 1647, Charles I was given the opportunity to escape.

He was recaptured.

The majority in Parliament, on 5 December 1648, agreed ‘That the concessions offered by the king were satisfactory to a settlement.’

Cromwell ordered Colonel Pryde to purge Parliament of those members who had voted

in favour of a settlement with the King.

The conspirators couldn’t find an English lawyer who would draw up a criminal charge against King Charles.


Alleged top child abuser Greville Janner (left) and fellow top Jewish leaders.

Carvajal instructed a Jew, Isaac Dorislaus, Manasseh Ben Israel’s Agent in England, to draw up the indictment upon which King Charles was tried. 

Charles was found guilty of the charges levelled against him by the International Jewish money-lenders.
On January 30th, 1649, he was beheaded.
The Jewish money-lenders had had their revenge because Edward I had expelled the Jews from England.
Oliver Cromwell received his Blood-Money.

Winston Churchill’s mother was Jewish.

‘Cunning, no doubt, came to Churchill in the Jewish genes transmitted by his mother Lady Randolph Churchill , née Jenny Jacobson/Jerome.’ – Moshe Kohn, Jerusalem Post.

Famous British Jews include:
Dominic Lawson (said to be linked to MI6) (aangirfan: Dominic Lawson, Con Coughlin and MI6)
James Goldsmith (said to be linked to Lady Diana) (aangirfan: PRINCE WILLIAM’S JEWISH MENTOR, WHO HAS LINKS TO 9 11)
Lord Victor Rothschild (linked to MI6 and said to have given nuclear secrets to Israel) (aangirfan: MI5 and MI6)
Bernard Lewis (alleged spy who helped invent the Clash of Civilisations) (aangirfan: Bernard Lewis: one of the secret rulers of the world?)
Sigmund Warburg (aangirfan: Wiseman, Warburg, Cecil and World War)
Keith Joseph (aangirfan: Margaret Thatcher’s Jewish links)
The Sassoons (said to be linked to the drugs trade) (aangirfan: ISRAELIS, DRUGS AND TERROR IN GOA)
Edwina Currie (linked to John Major) (aangirfan: Sex Scandals)
Robert Maxwell (said to be linked to Mossad and Donald Trump). (nona-people: The ‘Jewish Conspiracy’ in the UK)

“If you’re on the biggest kind of job and are bound to get to the real boss, ten to one you are brought up against a little, white-faced Jew in a bath-chair, with an eye like a rattlesnake.”

THE THIRTY NINE STEPS and JEWS

On 18 October 2010, Suraci wrote about Another 911 for the tribe 

According to Suraci:

Cromwell’s siege of Drogheda, in Ireland, took place in September 1649 at the beginning of Cromwell’s conquest of Ireland.

According to Wikipedia, the date was 11 September 1649.

Cromwell – dictator of Britain from 1653-58 

Oliver Cromwell was the typical Christian soldier-politician.

“During his lifetime, some tracts painted him as a hypocrite motivated by power [84] ” (Oliver Cromwell – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia )

Oliver Cromwell and other parliamentary leaders have been “presented as… sexual deviants, even paedophiles.”

(X * The Later Seventeenth Century — Steggle et al. 85 (1): 513 … )

At the siege of Drogheda in September 1649, Oliver Cromwell massacred nearly 3,500 people, including civilians, after the town’s capture.[29]


Drogheda in Ireland, 1649.

At the Siege of Wexford in October, another massacre took place, with up to 1,500 civilians murdered by Cromwell’s men.[30]

At Drogheda, a group of defenders barricaded themselves in Millmount Fort. They negotiated a surrender, but were then disarmed and killed.

The slave trade is said to have Jewish links. (Slave Trade – Jewish Slave Ship Owners)
Cromwell sent some of the Irish to the West Indies.
Sir William Petty wrote in his The Political Anatomy of Ireland (1672)
(Politics.ie • View topic – Oliver Cromwell was a Pimp and Child …):
“Widows and orphans… were kidnapped and transported by the slave trading merchants of Bristol…”

From the site Politics.ie • View topic – Oliver Cromwell was a Pimp and Child …, we learn:

“Cromwell had been informed that Englishmen in the West Indies had ‘only Negresses and Maroon women to solace them,’ as Cromwell’s son Henry put it.

“Cromwell’s puritan sensibilities did not hinder him from jumping to supply the colonists lust for fresh young white flesh – and making a good profit to boot.

“A Captain John Vernon, for example, was employed by the Commissioners for Ireland to kidnap 250 Irish girls around twelve years of age and transport them to Barbados.

“Once in Barbados they were raped by their English ‘masters’and, later, forced to breed with Black men – as the English officers found the Irish girls ‘cold’ and they needed to be whipped into submission, where ‘half caste’ girls, who had been trained to their perversions from childhood, were much more to the English taste.

“It’s estimated that tens of thousands of Irish children, both boys and girls, were kidnapped to supply this vile trade.”

In 1661, Cromwell’s corpse was removed from Westminster Abbey and then dangled from a gibbet at Tyburn. His head was displayed on a spike for 20 years.

Advertisements

British Democracy is Dysfunctional 

British Democracy is Dysfunctional 

A significant proportion of Labour MPs are actively seeking to cause their own party to do badly in forthcoming local elections, with the aim of damaging the leader of that party. To that end they have attacked Jeremy Corbyn relentlessly in a six week crescendo, in parliament and in the entirely neo-liberal owned corporate media, over the Skripal case, over Syria, and over crazy allegations of anti-semitism, again and again and again.

I recall reporting on an Uzbek Presidential election where the “opposition” candidate advised voters to vote for President Karimov. When you have senior Labour MPs including John Woodcock, Jess Phillips, John Mann, Luciana Berger, Mike Gapes, Wes Streeting and Ruth Smeeth carrying on a barrage of attacks on their own leader during a campaign, and openly supporting Government positions, British democracy has become completely dysfunctional. No amount of posing with leaflets in their constituencies will disguise what they are doing, and every Labour activist and trade unionist knows it.

British democracy cannot become functional again until Labour voters have a chance to vote for candidates of their party who are not supporters of the neo-liberal establishment. This can only happen by the removal as Labour candidates of a very large number of Labour MPs.

That it is “undemocratic” for party members to select their candidates freely at each election, and it is “democratic” for MP’s to have the guaranteed candidacy for forty years irrespective of their behaviour, is a nonsensical argument, but one to which the neo-liberal media fiercely clings as axiomatic. Meanwhile in the SNP, all MPs have to put themselves forward to party members equally with other candidates for selection at every election. This seems perfectly normal. Indeed every serious democratic system elects people for a fixed term. Labour members do not elect their constituency chairman for life, so why should they elect their parliamentary candidate for life? Why do we keep having general elections rather than voters elect the MP for life?

Election of parliamentary candidates for life is in fact a perfectly ludicrous proposition, but as it is currently vital to attempts to retain undisputed neo-liberal hegemony, anybody who dissents from the idea that candidacy is for life is reviled in the corporate and state media as anti-democratic, whereas the truth is of course the precise opposite.

The election of Jeremy Corbyn to the Labour leadership was a fundamental change in the UK. Previously the choice offered to electors in England and Wales was between two parties with barely distinguishable neo-liberal domestic policies, and barely distinguishable neo-conservative foreign policies. Jeremy Corbyn then erupted onto centre stage from the deepest backbenches, and suddenly democracy appeared to offer people an actual choice. Except that at the centre of power Jeremy did not in fact command his own party, as its MPs were largely from the carefully vetted Progress camp and deeply wedded to neo-conservative foreign policy, including a deep-seated devotion to the interests of the state of Israel as defined by the Israeli settlers and nationalist wing, and almost as strongly wedded to the economic shibboleths of neo-liberalism.

These Labour MPs were, in general, prepared grudgingly to go along with a slightly more social democratic economic policy, but drew the line absolutely at abandoning the neo-conservative foreign policy of their hero Tony Blair. So pro-USA policy, support for bombings and missiles as “liberal intervention” in a Middle Eastern policy firmly aligned to the interests of Israel and against the Palestinians, and support for nuclear weapons and the promotion of arms industry interests through a new cold war against Russia, are the grounds on which they stand the most firmly against their own party leadership – and members. Over these issues, these Labour MPs will support, including with voting in parliament, the Tories any day.

I have never voted Labour. I come from a philosophical viewpoint of the liberal individualist rather than of working class solidarity. Labour support for nuclear weapons and other WMD, in the blinkered interest of the members of the General Municipal and Boilermakers’ Union, is one reason that I could not vote Labour. The other is of course that in many cases, if you vote Labour you are very likely to be sending to parliament an individual who will vote with the Tories to escalate the arms race and conduct dangerous and destructive proxy wars in the Middle East.

There is an excellent article on Another Angry Voice which lists the only 18 MPs who were brave enough to vote against Theresa May’s 2014 Immigration Act, which enshrined dogwhistle racism and the hostile environment policy.

Diane Abbott (Labour)
Jeremy Corbyn (Labour)
Jonathan Edwards (Plaid Cymru)
Mark Lazarowicz (Labour)
John Leech (Liberal Democrat)
Elfyn Llwyd (Plaid Cymru)
Caroline Lucas (Green)
Angus MacNeil (SNP)
Fiona Mactaggart (Labour)
John McDonnell (Labour)
Angus Robertson (SNP)
Dennis Skinner (Labour)
Sarah Teather (Liberal Democrat)
David Ward (Liberal Democrat)
Mike Weir (SNP)
Eilidh Whiteford (SNP)
Hywel Williams (Plaid Cymru)
Pete Wishart (SNP)

5 of the 6 SNP MPs stood against this racism (the sixth was absent) and the current leadership of the Labour Party stood alone against the Blairites and Tories in doing so. The Windrush shame should inspire Labour members to deselect every single one of the Red Tories who failed to vote against that Immigration Act. It is also a measure of the appalling shame of the Liberal Democrats, of whom only three of their sixty odd MPs opposed it, and who consigned themselves to the dustbin of history through Nick Clegg’s gross careerism and right wing principles.

There is more to say though. This vote is testament to the great deal in common which the SNP have with the current Labour leadership (who also personally consistently opposed Trident), as opposed to with the bulk of Labour MPs. Put another way, Corbyn, Abbot and McDonnell have more in common with the SNP than the Blairites. It is also a roll-call of those MPs who have most consistently stood against the appalling slow genocide of the Palestinians. It is astonishing how often that issue is a reliable touchstone of where people stand in modern British politics.

Corbyn’s supporters have slowly gained control of major institutions within the Labour Party. The essential next move is for compulsory re-selection of parliamentary candidates at every election and an organised purge of the Blairites. If the Labour Party does not take that step, I could not in conscience urge anyone to vote for it, even in England, but rather to look very carefully at the actual individual candidates standing and decide who deserves your support.

Why Did The Vatican Remove 14 Books From The Bible in 1684?

Why Did The Vatican Remove 14 Books From The Bible in 1684?

 

The Roman Catholic church has a notorious history that most people don’t even need explained to them these days.

As with other powerful institutions of this kind throughout history, they are known for committing atrocities against people. For instance, the genocide against the Cathars centuries ago.

Today people know some kind of pedophilia culture exists beneath the Vatican and the Catholic church.

Various changes were made to the Bible over the years, and people suspect a lot of the good parts have been taken out.

For instance, in the year 1611 the Bible received a translation into English from Latin. In that time, the Bible was composed of a total of 80 books.

The last 14 books of it are not in our Bible today, and they used to compose the end of the Old Testament.

They were the books:

  • 1 Esdras
  • 2 Esdras
  • Tobit
  • Judith
  • The rest of Esther
  • The Wisdom of Solomon
  • Ecclesiasticus
  • Baruch with the epistle Jeremiah
  • The Songs of the 3 Holy children
  • The history of Susana
  • bel and the dragon
  • The prayer for Manasses
  • 1 Maccabees
  • 2 Maccabees

 

It was apparently the year 1684 when these books were removed from all versions of the Bible, except for a 1611 edition which was the very first one to be translated into English.

You might observe that in this first edition, Jesus’ name is actually spelled IESUS, and pronounced like Yahashua. Why then does everyone continue to refer to him as this other pronunciation?

They say that a particularly interesting book excluded from our modern Bible is the Wisdom of Solomon.

Solomon has been called one of the most epic and legendary characters from the Bible. The man is mythologically the son of David and was called the wisest man that has ever lived. He was seen as a benevolent figure, but this excerpt might tell a different story.

This excluded part of the Bible reads:

“Wisdom of Solomon 2:1-24

1 For the ungodly said reasoning with them selves, but not aright, our life is short and tedious and in death of a man there is no remedy: neither was there any man known to have returned from the grave.

2 For we are born at all adventure: and we shall be hereafter as though we had never been: for the breath of our nostrils is as smoke, and the little spark in the moving of our heart

3 Which being extinguished, our body shall be turned into ashes, and our spirit shall vanish as the soft air,

4 And our name shall be forgotten in time, and no man shall have our works in remembrance, and our life shall pass away as the trace of a cloud, and shall be dispersed as a mist, that is driven away, with the beams of the sun, and overcome with the heat thereof.

5 For our time is very shadow that passeth away; and after our end there is no returning: for it is fast sealed, so that no man cometh again.

6 Come on there for let us enjoy the good things that are present: and let us speedily use the creatures like as in youth.

7 Let us fill ourselves with costly wine and ointments: and let no flower of the Spring pass by us.

8 Let us crown ourselves with rosebuds, before they be withered:

9 Let none of us go without his part of our voluptuousness: let us leave tokens of our joyfulness in every place: for this is our portion and our lot is this.

10 Let us oppress the poor righteous man, let us not spare the widow, nor reverence the ancient gray hairs of the aged.

11 Let our strength be  the law of justice: for that which is feeble is found to be nothing worth.

12 Therefore let us lie in wait for the righteous; because HE is not of our turn, and HE is clean contrary to our doings. He upbraideth  us with our offending of the law, and ojecteth to our infamy the transgression of our education.

13 HE professeth to have the knowledge of the MOST HIGH, and calleth HIS self the child of the LORD.

14 HE was made to reprove our thoughts

15 HE is grievous unto us even to behold, for HIS life is not like other men’s, HIS ways are of another fashion.

16 We are esteemed of HIM as counterfeits: HE abstaineth from our ways as from filthiness: HE pronounceth the end of the just to be blessed, and maketh HIS boast that GOD is HIS father.

17 Let us see if HIS words be true: and let us prove what shall happen in the end of HIM.

18 For if the just man be the Son of THE MOST HIGH, HE will help HIM and deliver HIM from the hands of HIS enemies.

19 Let us examine HIM with despitefulness and torture, that we may know HIS meekness and prove HIS patience.

20
Let us condemn HIM with a shameful death: for by HIS own mouth HE shall be respected…..”

A few questions naturally arise from reading the aforementioned chapter. Who exactly is Solomon talking about, killing with a “shameful death?” Why did it contradict the agenda of the Vatican to have this chapter in their new Bible, and why were these 14 books removed? Is Solomon sounding crazy and evil, or is there something we don’t know?

Some say here Solomon was speaking of Jesus. If the Bible is historically accurate, Jesus would have been born about 900 years after the death of Solomon. Some claim this hidden chapter refers to Jesus because “they killed the son with a shameful death.”

They cite the fact that the “son” in the above excerpt had actions or ways that were different from everybody else, and the fact that he claims to be the child of the most high and a righteous poor man.

This seems to really contradict what the rest of the Bible says about Solomon. He is kind of a man who was entrenched in the occult, as he worshiped several gods and was vulnerable to women.

The Temple of Solomon is considered to be a spiritual birth place of Freemasonry, and we all know how influential that seems to be from behind the scenes.

People should look into the hidden chapters of the Bible if they need something to think about.

British Propaganda and Disinformation: An Imperial and Colonial Tradition

British Propaganda and Disinformation: An Imperial and Colonial Tradition

Wayne Madsen — Strategic Culture April 16, 2018

White Helmet

When it comes to creating bogus news stories and advancing false narratives, the British intelligence services have few peers. In fact, the Secret Intelligence Service (MI-6) has led the way for its American “cousins” and Britain’s Commonwealth partners – from Canada and Australia to India and Malaysia – in the dark art of spreading falsehoods as truths. Recently, the world has witnessed such MI-6 subterfuge in news stories alleging that Russia carried out a novichok nerve agent attack against a Russian émigré and his daughter in Salisbury, England. This propaganda barrage was quickly followed by yet another – the latest in a series of similar fabrications – alleging the Syrian government attacked civilians in Douma, outside of Damascus, with chemical weapons.

It should come as no surprise that American news networks rely on British correspondents stationed in northern Syria and Beirut as their primary sources. MI-6 has historically relied on non-official cover (NOC) agents masquerading primarily as journalists, but also humanitarian aid workers, Church of England clerics, international bankers, and hotel managers, to carry out propaganda tasks. These NOCs are situated in positions where they can promulgate British government disinformation to unsuspecting actual journalists and diplomats.

For decades, a little-known section of the British Foreign Office – the Information Research Department (IRD) – carried out propaganda campaigns using the international media as its platform on behalf of MI-6. Years before Syria’s Bashar al-Assad, Iraq’s Saddam Hussein, Libya’s Muammar Qaddafi, and Sudan’s Omar al-Bashir became targets for Western destabilization and “regime change.” IRD and its associates at the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) and in the newsrooms and editorial offices of Fleet Street broadsheets, tabloids, wire services, and magazines, particularly “The Daily Telegraph,” “The Times,” “Financial Times,” Reuters, “The Guardian,” and “The Economist,” ran media smear campaigns against a number of leaders considered to be leftists, communists, or FTs (fellow travelers).

These leaders included Indonesia’s President Sukarno, North Korean leader (and grandfather of Pyongyang’s present leader) Kim Il-Sung, Egypt’s Gamal Abdel Nasser, Cyprus’s Archbishop Makarios, Cuba’s Fidel Castro, Chile’s Salvador Allende, British Guiana’s Cheddi Jagan, Grenada’s Maurice Bishop, Jamaica’s Michael Manley, Nicaragua’s Daniel Ortega, Guinea’s Sekou Toure, Burkina Faso’s Thomas Sankara, Australia’s Gough Whitlam, New Zealand’s David Lange, Cambodia’s Norodom Sihanouk, Malta’s Dom Mintoff, Vanuatu’s Father Walter Lini, and Ghana’s Kwame Nkrumah.

After the Cold War, this same propaganda operation took aim at Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic, Sinn Fein leader Gerry Adams, Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez, Somalia’s Mohamad Farrah Aidid, and Haiti’s Jean-Bertrand Aristide. Today, it is Assad’s, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s, and Catalonian independence leader Carles Puigdemont’s turn to be in the Anglo-American state propaganda gunsights. Even Myanmar leader Aung San Suu Kyi, long a darling of the Western media and such propaganda moguls as George Soros, is now being targeted for Western visa bans and sanctions over the situation with Muslim Rohingya insurgents in Rakhine State.

Through IRD-MI-6-Central Intelligence Agency joint propaganda operations, many British journalists received payments, knowingly or unknowingly, from the CIA via a front in London called Forum World Features (FWF), owned by John Hay Whitney, publisher of the “New York Herald Tribune” and a former US ambassador to London. It is not a stretch to believe that similar and even more formal relationships exist today between US and British intelligence and so-called British “journalists” reporting from such war zones as Syria, Iraq, Libya, Yemen, Afghanistan, and the Gaza Strip, as well as from much-ballyhooed nerve agent attack locations as Salisbury, England.

No sooner had recent news reports started to emerge from Douma about a Syrian chlorine gas and sarin agent attack that killed between 40 to 70 civilians, British reporters in the Middle East and London began echoing verbatim statements from the Syrian “White Helmets” and the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.

In actuality, the White Helmets – claimed by Western media to be civilian defense first-responders but are Islamist activists connected to jihadist radical groups funded by Saudi Arabia – are believed to have staged the chemical attack in Douma by entering the municipality’s hospital and dowsing patients with buckets of water, video cameras at the ready. The White Helmets distributed their videos to the global news media, with the BBC and Rupert Murdoch’s Sky News providing a British imprimatur to the propaganda campaign asserting that Assad carried out another “barrel bomb” chemical attack against “his own people.” And, as always, the MI-6 financed Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, an anti-Assad news front claimed to be operated by a Syrian expatriate and British national named Rami Abdel Rahman from his clothing shop in Coventry, England, began providing second-sourcing for the White Helmet’s chemical attack claims.

With President Trump bringing more and more neo-conservatives, discredited from their massive anti-Iraq propaganda operations during the Bush-Cheney era, into his own administration, the world is witnessing the prolongation of the “Trump Doctrine.”

The Trump Doctrine can best be explained as follows: A nation will be subject to a US military attack depending on whether Trump is facing a severe political or sex scandal at home.

Such was the case in April 2017, when Trump ordered a cruise missile attack on the joint Syrian-Russian airbase at Shayrat, Syria. Trump was still reeling from the resignation of his National Security Adviser, Lt. General Michael Flynn, in February over the mixing of his private consulting business with his official White House duties. Trump needed a diversion and the false accusation that Assad used sarin gas on the village of Khan Sheikoun on April 4, 2017, provided the necessary pabulum for the war-hungry media.

The most recent cruise missile attack was to divert the public’s attention away from Trump’s personal attorney being raided by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, a sex scandal involving Trump and a porn actress, and a “tell-all” book by Trump’s fired FBI director, James Comey.

Although these two scandals provided opportunities for the neo-cons to test Trump with false flag operations in Syria, they were not the first time such actions had been carried out. In 2013, the Syrian government was blamed for a similar chemical attack on civilians in Ghouta. That year, Syrian rebels, supported by the Central Intelligence Agency, admitted to the Associated Press reporter on the ground in Syria that they had been given banned chemical weapons by Saudi Arabia, but that the weapons canisters exploded after improper handling by the rebels. Immediately, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights and Syrian rebel organizations operating out of Turkey claimed that Assad had used chemical-laden barrel bombs on “his own people.” However, Turkish, American, and Lebanese sources confirmed that it was the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) that had badly bungled a false flag sarin nerve agent attack on Ghouta.

Few Western media outlets were concerned about a March 19, 2013, sarin nerve agent by the Bashair al-Nasr Brigade rebel group linked to the US- and British-backed Free Syrian Army. The rebels used a “Bashair-3” unguided projectile, containing the deadly sarin agent, on civilians in Khan al-Assal, outside Aleppo. At least 27 civilians were killed, and scores of others injured in the attack. The Syrian Kurds also reported the use of chemical weapons on them during the same time frame by Syrian rebel groups backed by the United States, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia. The usual propaganda operations – Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, Doctors Without Borders, the BBC, CNN, and Sky News – were all silent about these attacks.

In 2013, April 2017, and April 2018, the Western media echo chamber blared out all the same talking points: “Assad killing his own people,” “Syrian weapons of mass destruction,” and the “mass murder of women and children.” Western news networks featured videos of dead women and children, while paid propagandists, known as “contributors” to corporate news networks – all having links to the military-intelligence complex – demanded action be taken against Assad.

Trump, now being advised by the notorious neocon war hawk John Bolton, the new National Security Adviser, began referring to Assad as an “animal” and a “monster.” Bolton, along with Vice President Dick Cheney’s chief of staff Irving Lewis “Scooter” Libby, helped craft similar language against Saddam Hussein prior to the 2003 US invasion and occupation of Iraq. It was not coincidental that Trump – at the urging of Bolton and other neocons – gave a full pardon to Libby on the very same day he ordered the cruise missile attack on Damascus and other targets in Syria. Libby was convicted in 2005 of perjury and illegally disclosing national security information.

The world is being asked to take, at face value, the word of patented liars like Trump, Bolton, and other neocons who are now busy joining the Trump administration at breakneck speed. The corporate media unabashedly acts as though it never lied about the reasons given by the United States and Britain for going to war in Iraq and Libya. Why should anyone believe them now?

Source

 

How the “British” Used “Appeasement” to Trick Hitler into a Two-Front War

April 18, 2018

aaaHalifax.jpg
 Halifax, Life, July 17, 1939)

(Edward Wood, Lord Halifax)

The pre-war British establishment was Communist to the core.

They put Hitler into power in Germany and then maneuvered him into

a war that would destroy Germany as an independent country once and for all. 

They were all Freemasons. The goal of Freemasonry is the triumph of

Communism. 

(from Sept. 2006) 

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

In Dec. 1942 Heinrich Mueller, Chief of the Gestapo, rolled up the Soviet spy network in mainland Europe and secured a list of Soviet agents and informants in England that reads like a “who’s who”of the British establishment. This list lifts the veil from modern history.

Müller,_Heinrich.jpg(left, Gestapo Chief Heinrich Muller) 

Soviet spies include Edward Wood, Lord Halifax, Neville Chamberlain’s Foreign Secretary and an architect of the “Appeasement” policy.

Appeasement encouraged Hitler to think England wanted him to expand eastward against the Soviet Union.  Appeasement was designed to trap Hitler in a two-front war which would level Germany (and Europe) and kill sixty million people.
Mueller’s list of spies includes Victor Rothschild, the head of the central banking dynasty, one of the “Cambridge Five” traitors. Curiously, the other four (Burgess, Maclean, Blunt, and Philby) aren’t on Mueller’s list. Halifax’s son married a Rothschild.

The list also includes Charles Hambro, another banker of Jewish origin who was part of a Bank of England decision to continue financing Nazism in 1934 as a “stabilizing influence.” Obviously, as a Soviet asset, this man was not pro-Nazi. The explanation is that both Nazism and Communism are Illuminati creations.

The list also includes Sir Robert Waley-Cohen and many members of the anti-appeasement “Focus” group that funded Winston Churchill. Waley-Cohen was the Chairman of the Rothschild-controlled Shell Oil and the leader of the British Jewish Community.

Other bankers, banking scions, and industrialists include Eugen SpierMaurice BaringLeonard MontefioreEdward GuggenheimSir Robert Mond and Sir Phillip Sassoon. All are of Jewish origin.

Prominent Labor Party and trade union leaders included Ernest Bevin, Harold Laski, Herbert Stanley Morrison and Sir Walter Citrine. Members of ancient aristocratic families include Richard Combe Abdy, Baron Strabogli, and Admiral Reginald Plunkett-Ernle-Erle-Drax. There was press mogul J.S. Elias, cartoonist Victor Weisz and Daily Express Chairman Ralph D. Blumenfeld.

Prominent civil servants include Rex Leeper of the Foreign Office ruling clique and Sir Maurice Hankey, who as cabinet secretary and Clerk of the Privy Council (1919-1938) knew all the secrets. There was Slavonic scholar Bernard Pares and Jurist Sir Hirsch Lauterpacht. (The complete agent list is at the end of this article.)

FREEMASONS

What did this disparate group have in common? About half of them are recognizably Jewish. But the connection that binds all of them likely is the Illuminati, the top rung of Freemasonry. Its aim is to weaken mankind through a series of contrived  wars in order to establish a Masonic or “Illuminist” world dictatorship dedicated to the “light giver” Lucifer (their alter ego.) Trump, Obama, Bush, Clinton, Kerry etc. are all members.

The Illuminati started Communism. Their common anniversary is May 1; their common symbol is the satanic inverted pentagram. They funded the Bolshevik Revolution and secretly ran the USSR, which was a model for the New World Order. Far from being spies for Stalin, some of these men probably were his superiors.

Soviet Russia was a dummy-state creation of the London-based Illuminati bankers. The Second World War, the Cold War, the War on Terror and now Cold War II are all their inventions. They are responsible for 9-11 and for the neopagan assault on Western Civilization, Christianity and Islam (incl. family, nation, race, morality, and truth) that we call modernism, humanism and globalism.

Heinrich Mueller died in California in 1983. The CIA recruited Mueller in Switzerland in 1948 and paid him $1 million for an Interrogation running 1000-pages that include this list. Mueller left his microfilmed archives to his nephew, “Douglas Gregory” who has published a part.
BAIT AND SWITCH

The Bank of England funded the rise of Adolf Hitler through the Schroder Bank.

frank-cyril-tiarks-and-grand-daughter-henriettatiarks.gif(left, Tiarcks and his granddaughter) 

F.C. Tiarcks, the Managing Director of the Schroder Bank, was also a Director of the Bank of England.

Eustace Mullins writes: “Because his own financial backers, the Schroders, were sponsoring the Appeasement Party, Hitler believed there would be no war [with England.] He did not suspect that the backers of the Appeasement Party, now that Chamberlain had served his purpose in duping Hitler, would cast Chamberlain aside and make Churchill the Prime Minister.” (The Secrets of the Federal Reserve, pp.76-78.)

While history portrays Hitler as duping the naive Neville Chamberlain and Lord Halifax, it appears Hitler himself was tricked into thinking he could expand eastward with impunity. Neville Chamberlain wasn’t in on the secret. (He died prematurely just months after leaving office.) But as a Soviet informant, Halifax certainly was instrumental.

As an early opponent of British rearmament, Halifax encouraged Hitler’s plans and later complimented the dictator for being a “genuine hater of Communism.” In 1937, Halifax actually offered Hitler changes in the “European Order” in regard to Danzig, Austria and Czechoslovakia.

“It was Halifax not Hitler who first mentioned by name the areas where the Versailles Treaty might be reinterpreted to Germany’s benefit,” writes historian Andrew Roberts. “Halifax did the one thing which Eden had told him not to, and which Vansittart warned would ‘bring the European card-castle tumbling down.’ Moreover he did it not once but thrice in the course of the conversations.” (The Holy Fox: A Biography of Lord Halifax, 1991, pp. 67, 70-71.)

Halifx’s closest adviser was Philip Kerr, Lord Lothian, a member of the Rothschild-Milner-Rhodes  Round Table secret society (i.e  the Illuminati). According to Roberts, Lothian was “a friend of Halifax’s and had  non-parliamentary political influence of a type seldom seen in today’s politics.” (109)

Appeasement was designed to encourage Hitler to take action which would justify a declaration of war by the West.

“What we want to secure is the certainty of a war on two fronts,” Halifax said in March 1939. (Roberts, 146) Halifax was responsible for the foolhardy British guarantee of Poland that led to this war declaration in Sept. 1939. The USSR also invaded Poland but there was no declaration of war against it. Stalin was pre-primed to attack the Nazis in 1941.(This is essentially the dealChristian Rakovsky offered Stalin 1938.)

The whole knuckle-biting drama of war and peace in 1939-41, including England as the lonely defender of freedom, was a charade. Germany was in the cross-hairs all along. Could the USA be in the same position today as tensions in Syria increase?

The appeasers and their opponents were two Illuminati house teams pursuing common goals. Lady Astor’s Cliveden Manor was supposed to be the HQ of the (pro-Nazi) appeasement party but, as Andrew Roberts points out, arch anti-appeasers like Duff Cooper, Anthony Eden and Russian Foreign Minister Maxim Litvinov (nee Meir Finkelstein) were regular guests. (67) 

CONCLUSION

Wars are the artificial creation of the Illuminati, a satanic cult that extends its tentacles over the whole planet. “Muller’s List” provides a glimpse at the composition of this group: bankers, industrialists, aristocrats, military, scholars, trade unionists and media.

There are a lot of Jews but it should be obvious that the Illuminati victimized Jews as much as anyone. Jews have been the canon fodder for Communism, Zionism and Nazism. Instead of defending the Illuminati, Jews should revile it. Otherwise, they appear to be in collusion.

Hitler was groomed and funded for the purpose of destroying Germany’s national aspirations and to provide a pretext for the State of Israel. The Illuminati starts wars to destroy nation states, demoralize humanity, consolidate power and produce huge profits and debt slavery. This cult, which has a stranglehold on thought and expression, pretty much defines realty. Our best course is to find our truth from different sources and define reality anew.

———
“Mueller’s List”  from Douglas Gregory, “Gestapo Chief: The 1948 Interrogation of Heinrich Muller Vol. 3 p.107.

Lt. Col. Frederick William Abbot
Sir Maurice Hankey
Richard Combe Abdy
Eugen Spier
George Dixon Abraham
Baron Strabogli
Frederick Edward Fox Adam
J.S. Elias, Baron Southwood
Admiral Sir Percy Addison
Sir H.L. Rothband
Elkan Nathan Adler
Sir E.L. Goschen
Admiral Oliver Backhouse
Mrs. Blanche Dugdale
John Ball
Sir Robert Wood
Maurice Baring
Sir Robert Mond
Ralph D. Blumenfeld
Jurgen Kuczynski
Sir Harry Robert Boyd
Sir Robert Waley-Cohen
Sir Charles Hambro
Rex Leeper
Edward Wood (Lord Halifax)
Sir Walter Citrine
Walter Rosenhain
Victor Rothschild

Charles Masterman Herz
Sir Philip Sassoon
Victor Weisz
Sir Bernard Pares
Friedrich Saxl
Ernest Bevin
Sir Hirsch Lauterpacht
Herbert Stanley Morrison
Harold Joseph Laski
Sir Reginald Plunkett-Erle-Drax
Edward Armand Guggenheim

Latest!–  Illuminati Jewish England Also Started World War One  (Thanks Robert!)

See also my:

Bankers extended WWI By Three Years

Bankers Engineered US WW2 Intervention

Hitler Didn’t Want World War

and articles on Winston Churchill and Lester Pearson.

Historian of “Soviet” Espionage, John Costello, Murdered

More on how British Bankers Financed Hitler

First Comment  from Brian Mitchell “Ex Insider”

Hi Henry, The new article on W W II is excellent just 2 small mistakes, you neglect to point out that Rothchild appointee Lord Cherwell
who was inseparable from Churchill in W W II was probably the most important Freemason in the country, second only to Herbert Morrison
Home office minister who oversaw all war dept contracts going to Jewish firms.

Morrison as Peter Mandelson’s grandfather was in daily contact with Seif in Hampstead, the base for Jewish support of the Russian war effort.

Nevile Chamberlian spent 4 years with a team of experts who were allowed into every German factory. Chamberlian believed Britain should join with Germany against the Soviet Bloc, which is why he was slowly poisoned by Churchills doctor Lord Moran. Lawrence Burgis Churchills secretary spoke of this on the record before his death.

You constantly push the lie that Hitler was part of the plan. You say Illuminati. During this period the word did not exist; it was just jews, and in fact, Rothschild explicit order was no goy to be a major player, only Jews. Hitler had no choice but to attack Russia before they attacked him, Hitler was not Illuminati as you claim. Finally, a great article in many other respects

Robert P writes:

World War 2.
“We will force this war upon Hitler, if he wants it or not.”  Winston Churchill. 1936 broadcast.
________________________________________________________

“Germany becomes too powerful, (Economically) we have to crush it.” Winston Churchill, November 1936 speaking to US General Robert E. Wood.
________________________________________________________

“This war is an English war and its goal is the destruction of Germany.” Winston Churchill, Autumn 1939 broadcast.
________________________________________________________

“The war wasn’t only about abolishing fascism, but to conquer sales markets. We could have, if we had intended so, prevented this war from breaking out without doing one shot, but we didn’t want to.” Winston Churchill to Truman. Fultun, USA March 1946.
________________________________________________________

“Germany’s unforgivable crime before WW2 was its attempt to loosen its economy out of the world trade system, and to build up an independent exchange system from which the world finance couldn’t profit anymore. We butchered the wrong pig.”

Winston Churchill. The Second World War, Bern, 1960.
________________________________________________________

“We made a monster, a devil out of Hitler, therefore we couldn’t disavow it after the war. After all, we mobilized the masses against the devil himself. So we were forced to play our part in this diabolic scenario after the war. In no way we could have pointed out to our people that the war only was an economic preventive measure.” US Sec of State, James Baker. 1992.
________________________________________________________

“The enemy is the German Reich and not Nazism, and those who still haven’t understood this, haven’t understood anything.”

Churchill’s chief counselor Robert Lord Vansittart, as said to foreign minister Lord Halifax, September 1940.

MYSTERIOUS OPRAH WINFREY

MYSTERIOUS OPRAH WINFREY


Oprah and the gay Ricky Martin.

Oprah Winfrey, a billionaire, was born into poverty in rural Mississippi to a teenage single mother.

Oprah has stated that she was molested during her childhood and early teens and became pregnant at 14.

Her son died in infancy. [14]


Ritual child sexual abuse

Oprah’s stepmother, Barbara Winfrey, spoke to the Daily Mail.

“Barbara Winfrey insinuated that Oprah’s relationship with her public partner, Stedman Graham, was something of a front.

“Barbara Winfrey claimed that she never saw Stedman and Oprah hold hands or touch.”

Gayle King and Oprah.
“Oprah’s relationship with Gayle King was far more meaningful, Barbara Winfrey alleged.”

The best celebrity queer relationship conspiracy theories

Oprah is a friend of the Chabad organisation.

Oprah has met Michael Aquino.
….

“Oprah Winfrey used her TV program to market the Iraq war.

“Winfrey ran video clips in a sound-bite manner by ‘experts’ as a ‘moral’ obligation to rid the world of Saddam Hussein.”

Oprah Winfrey, Warmonger.

Senior Civil Servants Still Deeply Sceptical of Russian Responsibility for Skripal Poisoning 

Senior Civil Servants Still Deeply Sceptical of Russian Responsibility for Skripal Poisoning 

Well-placed FCO sources tell me it remains the case that senior civil servants in both the FCO and Home Office remain very sceptical of Russian guilt in the Skripal case. It remains the case that Porton Down scientists have identified the chemical as a “novichok-style” nerve agent but still cannot tie its production to Russia – there are many other possibilities. The effort to identify the actual perpetrator is making no headway, with the police having eliminated by alibi the Russian air passenger on the same flight as Julia Skripal identified as suspicious by MI5 purely on grounds of the brevity of their stay.

That senior civil servants do not regard Russian responsibility as a fact is graphically revealed in this minute from head of the civil service, Sir Jeremy Heywood, sent to officials following the attack on Syria. Note the very careful use of language:

Their work was instrumental in ensuring widespread international support for the Government’s position on Russian responsibility for the Salisbury attack

This is very deliberate use of language by Sir Jeremy. Exactly as I explained with the phrase “of a type developed by Russia” about the nerve agent, you have to parse extremely carefully what is written by the senior civil service. They do not write extra phrases for no reason.

Sir Jeremy could have simply written of Russian responsibility as a fact, but he did not. His reference to “the government’s position on Russian responsibility” is very deliberate and an acknowledgement that other positions are possible. He deliberately refrains from asserting Russian responsibility as a fact. This is no accident and is tailored to the known views of responsible civil servants in the relevant departments, to whom he is writing.

This in no way detracts from the fact that Sir Jeremy takes it as read that it is the duty of civil servants to follow “the Government’s position”. But it is an acknowledgement that they do not have privately to believe it.

Allied missile strikes on Syria – a message from the Head of the Civil Service

In the early hours of 14 April, the armed forces of the United Kingdom, the United States and France launched a series of co-ordinated strikes on sites in Syria linked with the production and storage of chemical weapons. This was in response to the use of prohibited chemical weapons by the Syrian regime against the civilian population of Douma, whose horrific consequences were widely reported.

I want to thank civil servants in a number of departments, but especially in the Foreign & Commonwealth Office, the Ministry of Defence, Department for International Development, Department for Health and Social Care (and Public Health England), Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs, and the Cabinet Office, for their work after the attack on Douma and throughout the allied operation. This response was designed to degrade the Syrian regime’s chemical weapons capability and as a deterrent to their future use.

Coming after the nerve agent attack in Salisbury just over a month ago, I also want to take this opportunity to renew my gratitude to the hundreds of public servants – at home and abroad – involved in the response to that attack and the ongoing investigation. Their work was instrumental in ensuring widespread international support for the Government’s position on Russian responsibility for the Salisbury attack and the participation of many nations in the diplomatic sanctions that followed.

We could wish it was in different circumstances. However, the response to the Salisbury incident and the chemical attack on Douma showed the public service at its best: collaborative, professional and quick to act in the national interest, even under the greatest pressure.

Jeremy Heywood
Cabinet Secretary and Head of the Civil Service

Video: Pink Floyd’s Roger Waters Condemns US Led Air Strikes, “White Helmets are A Fake Organization”

Counter Information

Global Research, April 18, 2018
Dmitry Zolotarev 15 April 2018

Pink Floyd’s Roger Waters stood up against war propaganda and media disinformation, condemning the US-NATO bombing of Syria following the alleged chemical attack in Douma.

According to Waters,

“The White Helmets are a fake organization that exists only to create propaganda for the jihadists and terrorists…”

Watch the video below.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/video-pink-floyds-roger-waters-condemns-us-led-air-strikes-white-helmets-are-a-fake-organization/5636663

View original post

JOURNALISTS FOUND BOY FILMED IN WHITE HELMETS’ DOUMA CHEMIAL ATTACK VIDEO. HE DID IT FOR FOOD

Uprootedpalestinians's Blog

Source

18.04.2018

Journalists Found Boy Filmed In White Helmets' Douma Chemial Attack Video. He Did It For Food

Hassan Diab shown in Al-Jazeera’s coverage of the alleged chemical attack. Click to see the full-size image

A group of Russian correspondents led by Evgeny Poddubny has found a boy filmed by the White Helmets in their video showing people “affected” by the alleged chemical attack in Douma on April 7.

According to Poddubny:

  • 11-year-old Hassan Diab is fine;
  • He suffered no injures from the “chemical attack” because there was no attack (at least then and there);
  • The boy participated in the video for food (rice, dates and cookies).

Poddubny also contacted Hassan’s father – he also said that there was no chemical attack in the town.

Journalists Found Boy Filmed In White Helmets' Douma Chemial Attack Video. He Did It For Food

Hassan Diab during the “chemical attack” and after. Click to see the full-size image

Hassan’s story is quite similar to the case observed during the battle for Aleppo city in 2016. A photo of Omran Daqneesh became popular in the mainstream media and…

View original post 249 more words

A topnotch WordPress.com site

Truther's World

News and reviews brought to you from around the world

CO2 is Life

The Definitive Source for Exposing the Global Warming Hoax

Shooting the Messenger

As dissed on Fox News

Fabrication in BBC Panorama 'Saving Syria’s Children'

Analysis of the 30 September 2013 BBC Panorama documentary 'Saving Syria's Children' and related BBC News reports, contending that sequences filmed by BBC personnel and others at Atareb Hospital, Aleppo on 26 August 2013 purporting to show the aftermath of an incendiary bomb attack on a nearby school are largely, if not entirely, staged.

WEB OF DEBT BLOG

ARTICLES IN THE NEWS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . COMMENTS, FEEDBACK, IDEAS

Historical Tribune

The Factual Review

Desultory Heroics

A Chronicle of Dystopia and Resistance

Astute News

The Science Of News And Analysis

Taking Sides

Thinking Through and Against Received Opinion

The Last Refuge

Rag Tag Bunch of Conservative Misfits - Contact Info: TheLastRefuge@reagan.com

Citizen WElls

Obama eligibility, Obama news

Burst Updates

Burst Updates, an explosion of news, politics, and opinions.

tomfernandez28's Blog

A topnotch WordPress.com site

The Free

blog of the post capitalist transition.. Read or download the novel here + latest relevant posts

John Laurits

Insurgent journalism. Poetry. Weaponized Mathematics.

Hwaairfan's Blog

"We are all pieces of the puzzle of Truth, one piece missing and our self image is incomplete...Tawhid! !..."

Jim Campbell's

"A wise man can learn more from a foolish question than a fool can learn from a wise answer."~ Bruce Lee

WebInvestigator.KK.org - by F. Kaskais

Web Investigator.KK. org... is one web investigative resource for searching thousands of online sources, and public databases. This blog will change your life!

Johnsono ne'Blog'as

The Revolution Will Not Be Televised

Nwo Report

Nwo News, End Time, World News and Conspiracy News

%d bloggers like this: