Protocols of Zion are Genuine: Col. House Had a Personal Copy

Protocols of Zion are Genuine: Col. House Had a Personal Copy

March 17, 2018

house-edward-and-wilson.jpg(Ventriloquist Edward House, right, with his  Dummy President Woodrow Wilson, left)

Some time ago, Stan Monteith, (1929-2014) a pioneer NWO researcher, found a typewritten copy of the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” in the papers of Col. E.M. House at Yale University. 

This seemed like confirmation of the widely held view that House (1858-1938) was a Rothschild agent. House was an “adviser” to Woodrow Wilson and FDR. It makes sense that he would have a copy of the Blueprint for the New World Order in his possession. He elaborated on this diabolical program in his political manifesto, “Philip Dru Administrator.”(1912) I began a comparison of the two manuscripts here.

Spencer Percival continues this comparison below and makes the point, Why would

Rothschild’s US consiglieri own a private typescript if The Protocols were a “forgery?”  

“This is massive, the Protocols now having a direct provenance to an unimpeachable source which effectively destroys all the so-called debunking; even the ADL will have a hard job to discredit House as an anti-Semite.”

We are human collateral against the national “debt”:  House on “Social Security” -” Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges.”

Now, do you understand why they want our guns?


by Spencer Percival


Colonel Edward Mandell House (July 26, 1858 – March 28, 1938) was an adviser or ‘puppet master’ of two US presidents Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Delano Roosevelt, overseeing passage of the Federal Reserve Act, the so called Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution to permit Congress to levy an Income Tax, America’s entry into World War one, Versailles (where he also helped set up the Council on Foreign Relations, America’s equivalence of the Royal Institute), recognition of the Soviet Union, gold confiscation bank holiday, and formed The New Deal.

Considered by many to be a major Rothschild agent, he exposed his agenda for humanity in a meeting with Woodrow Wilson.

“[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property1 in a national system2 designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging.

By such methodology, we can compel people3 to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency4.

Every American will be forced to register or suffer being unable to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel5, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions.

Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading6 to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges.

They will be stripped of their rights7 and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund the government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges.

This will inevitably reap us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud which we will call ‘Social Insurance.’ Without realizing it, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and we will employ the high office8 of our dummy corporation9 to foment this plot against America.”


Notwithstanding all the furor that accompanied the Marsden publication from 1919 which continued throughout the twenties and thirties, House and his executors determined to leave to posterity this version of the Protocols.

On receipt of the copies I was most surprised at the tattered looking images of which were 99 manual typewritten pages replete with typo’s and multiple corrections and other indications11 that this was being copied and that the typist wasn’t a professional and therefore likely to be Edward House himself, which may suggest he didn’t wish any other eyes to see the document, however without going to YaleUniversity and comparing them to his other papers I cannot say conclusively it is equally possible that he received the MS ‘as is’ from another party.

My first action was to scan, ocr12 and proofread the manuscript and when done, one of the first things to stand out was missing protocols and duplicate ones. Whilst the missing protocol and one ‘duplicate protocol’ could be put down to a typo the same couldn’t be said for Protocol XI. for which there are two distinct ‘protocols’, thus the House MS has in fact 25 protocols as against 24 protocols in the MarsdenMS which may or may not have esoteric significance.

On closer examination what shows is a slightly different Protocol numbering and the splitting of aMarsden Protocol into two, thus Marsden Protocol 3 ‘Methods of Conquest’ has moved to HouseProtocol 10 causing Marsden Protocols 4 and 5 to become House Protocols 3 and 4, as HouseProtocol 5 doesn’t exist they realign at Protocol 6 and the second House Protocol 6 is, in fact, the first part of Marsden Protocol 7 and completed with House Protocol 7, the first of two Protocols’ 11 inHouse relates to Marsden Protocol 10 and the second House Protocol 11 realigns with MarsdenProtocol 11.

The first thing noticed is the economy of paragraphs in the House MS. But reading the two texts, although using alternate vocabularies, both still impart the same meaning or intent, which continues throughout the Protocols.

In Protocol 11 there is a Latin phrase, now Latin in French, English or Russian should be the same but here we have modus vivendi in the House MS and modus agendi in the Marsden MS, whilst it falls in with a consistent alternate vocabulary that imparts the same meaning or intent, for the reasons stated above you would expect it to be the same if it were a translation, additional a French term coups d’etatis used in House Protocol 11 but not in Marsden Protocol 11 but in Protocol 15 and not in HouseProtocol 15.

Henry Makow has compared the first eight pages of the House MS with the Marsden MS, and he concludes that the nuances of the different words are significant and whilst I do not disagree with that statement I consider the intent of the vocabulary of the text to be more significant.

Conclusion: Protocols were “Serving Notice”

Anyone who makes a honest study of the complete MSS cannot help but come to the conclusion that the source for the both of them is the same, whether that be a meeting or a text, with the inconsistencies noted above it points more to a meeting(s) than text, yet this does not explain the different orders in parts of the MS. That being the case the existence of the House MS proves the authenticity of the Marsden MS which most non-coincident theorists would have known anyway.

This is massive, the Protocols now having a direct provenance to an unimpeachable source which effectively destroys all the so-called debunking, even the ADL will have a hard job to discredit House as an anti-Semite.

As to the writer, I do not think it was an opposition copy for the simple reason it stands unique and surely the purpose of an opposition copy would be to disseminate it as widely as possible so that by now, over 100 years on, there would be several copies coming to light, also with this being about 9 years before the Marsden book came to press, it would have been a ‘hot book’.

I think that it is more likely the work of a group, possibly Chabad or given that most these people are Luciferians and Cabbalists it may have even been channeled, which brings to mind another Woodrow Wilson quote:

Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.

Currently, my time is very limited, my main region of research being Law13 and health, As such, I have learned that Notice (as mentioned at the start) is an integral part of law systems starting with the cosmic law and down to the common and municipal law. Cities used to post (Notice) their laws at the gate, I now believe that such ‘leaks’ are in some cases by design, the fact is mankind has been noticed and on the fulfillment of their plans they can legally say you were told, you did not resist, you consented. However, I shall in all probability use the comparisons above as a start to complete a comparison volume (unless you beat me to it), but for now, here is House’s ms PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETING OF THE ZIONIST MEN v2 Final (3).pdf

1 Children

2 Although all states had birth records by 1919, the use of the standardized version was not uniformly adopted until the 1930’s

3 Persons would be more correct, as these are attached to people.

4 Backed by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. Government!

5 Property

6 Record of Live Birth – Birth Certificate

7 The Bill of Rights does not apply to 14th Amendment U.S. Citizens.

8 Presidency

9 The U.S.A. as opposed to the republic which is the united states of America.

10 Which may or may not be a translation.

11 Addition of footnotes and comments to MS.

12 Optical Character Reader.

13 There are many misconceptions about the law, part of the same consensus reality with assumptions and presumptions allowed to be inculcated into society if you wish a glimpse of what real law, as opposed to code, is, a reasonable site to visit is Private Person.

Related– Protocols Forgery Argument Flawed


Finest hour for actor who was Churchill’s radio voice

Finest hour for actor who was Churchill’s radio voice

Vanessa Thorpe — The Guardian Oct 29, 2000

Winston Churchill. Click to enlarge

PROOF THAT some of Winston Churchill’s most famous radio speeches of the war were delivered by a stand-in has emerged with the discovery of a 78rpm record.

The revelation ends years of controversy over claims – repeatedly denied – that an actor had been officially asked to impersonate the Prime Minister on air.

The record makes it clear for the first time that Norman Shelley’s voice was used to broadcast some of the most important words in modern British history – including ‘We shall fight them on the beaches’. It is marked ‘BBC, Churchill: Speech. Artist Norman Shelley’ and stamped ‘September 7, 1942′.

The recording will also help to sort out the confusion about the authenticity of many of the Churchill tapes in circulation.

Shelley, a well-known radio actor who was Colonel Danby on The Archers before his death in 1980, first claimed in the late Seventies that the British Council had confidentially asked him to stand in for Churchill.

His allegation outraged many commentators. Biographers and historians have argued ever since about whether some of the key morale-boosting speeches of the era – including the ‘We shall fight them on the beaches’ Dunkirk speech of 4 June 1940 and the ‘Their finest hour’ speech of 18 June in the same year – could have been made by an actor. Both speeches were originally delivered by Churchill in the House of Commons which, at that time, was not wired for sound recording.

The power of these broadcasts is often credited with helping the Allied forces to win the war. Aside from Churchill’s undoubted gifts as a speech-writer, the impact of his confident and idiosyncratic delivery is held responsible by many for sustaining the ‘Blitz spirit’ on the Home Front.

But, according to Shelley, Churchill was too busy to come into a studio to record his words and so agreed that, as long as he had final approval of the voice, an actor might take his place. Later, the provenance of recordings of these speeches was further muddled by the fact that Churchill agreed to record some of his most memorable lines for the BBC archives after the war was over.

Last week the late actor’s son, Anthony Shelley, found the crucial record among his father’s possessions in his home near Chepstow, South Wales. He had always believed his father’s story, he told The Observer but is pleased to see him vindicated with some hard evidence. ‘I knew my father was not the sort to have been pulling people’s legs about something like this,’ he said.

‘There is absolutely no way he would have made this up, and a BBC recording would not exist unless they had intended to use it. The trouble is that, like a computer virus, once there is a recording out there that sounds right it will get around.’

This week Shelley will take the record for specialist analysis in the Devon recording studio of Robert Parker, an Australian sound expert. Together they hope to establish once and for all which of the recordings are genuine.

‘No one has yet had the opportunity to hear a certified recording of Norman doing his Winston and then compare the two,’ said Parker, who has just restored several original recordings of Churchill’s speeches for a second series on the war by Carlton Television, Britain at War in Colour. ‘While working on the programme it struck me that some of the famous recordings had a very different quality. Two in particular stick out: “We shall fight them on the beaches” and “Never was so much owed by so many to so few”. The voice seems different on both and so does the speech impediment. It almost sounds as if it was added on.’

Shelley told reporters in the Seventies that Churchill had even complimented him on getting his teeth right. ‘My father said he had taken his own false teeth out for the part,’ remembered Anthony, who is a conductor. He said that at the height of the war the British Council had asked his father to impersonate Churchill for broadcasts in America.

‘To say that Churchill was busy at the time would have been the understatement of the century,’ Anthony Shelley told The Observer.

‘My father would certainly not have asked for money. He did it secretly for Winston, who was his great hero. I don’t remember ever hearing the recordings, although I suppose I may have when I was a boy. My father kept it very quiet for a long while and then was rather embarrassed by all the fuss.’ This, he suggests, is why his father made no further attempt to prove his point.

Historian David Irving, author of Churchill’s War, was unable to verify Shelley’s story but found that the parliamentary speeches were the only ones for which the BBC had no contract with Churchill. The Churchill Archive Centre in Cambridge, however, has maintained that there is nothing to prove the late actor’s claim. Archivists there have argued that recordings of the speeches in question were made by Churchill after the war and then released by Decca as LPs in 1964.

These are now sold on EMI’s Music For Pleasure and Argo cassette labels and have been used in many documentaries and films. After they were re-released in 1983, the BBC asked Decca to stop claiming they were all BBC recordings. The next year BBC sound archivists explained that the additional parliamentary speeches must have been made privately by Churchill at his Chartwell home in Kent in about 1950.

In 1990 an American speech research group called Sensimetrics tested 20 of the speeches that Decca and EMI sell under Churchill’s name. The speech patterns on three recordings were found to be different. They were the disputed speeches originally made in Parliament in 1940: the Dunkirk speech, the ‘Finest Hour’ speech, and the one made on 13 May, when Churchill promised ‘blood, toil, tears and sweat’.



The UK gov is manufacturing its nerve agent case for ‘action’ on Russia

The UK gov is manufacturing its nerve agent case for ‘action’ on Russia

By Nafeez Ahmed — Insurge-Intelligence March 13, 2018

Chemical weapons team

On Monday, Prime Minister Theresa May announced that former Russian spy, Sergey Skripal and his daughter Yulia, were poisoned with “a military-grade nerve agent of a type developed by Russia” known as ‘Novichok’.

The chemical agent was identified by the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory at Porton Down. May referred to the British government’s “knowledge that Russia has previously produced this agent and would still be capable of doing so” as a basis to conclude that Russia’s culpability in the attack “is highly likely.”

On these grounds, she claimed that only two scenarios are possible:

“Either this was a direct act by the Russian State against our country. Or the Russian government lost control of this potentially catastrophically damaging nerve agent and allowed it to get into the hands of others.”

The British government’s line has been chorused uncritically by the entire global press corps, with little scrutiny of its plausibility.

But there is a problem: far from offering a clear-cut evidence-trail to Vladimir Putin’s chemical warfare labs, the use of Novichok in the nerve gas attack on UK soil points to a wider set of potential suspects, of which Russia is, in fact, the least likely.

Russia did actually destroy its nerve agent capabilities according to the OPCW

Yet a concerted effort is being made to turn facts on their head.

No clearer sign of this can be found than in the statement by Ambassador Peter Wilson, UK Permanent Representative to the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), in which he claimed that Russia has “failed for many years” to fully disclose its chemical weapons programme.

Wilson was parroting a claim made a year earlier by the US State Department that Russia had not made a complete declaration of its chemical weapons stockpile: “The United States cannot certify that Russia has met its obligations under the Convention.”

Yet these claims are contradicted by the OPCW itself, which in September 2017 declaredthat the independent global agency had rigorously verified the completed destruction of Russia’s entire chemical weapons programme, including of course its nerve agent production capabilities.

OPCW Director-General, Ahmet Üzümcü, congratulated Russia with the following announcement:

“The completion of the verified destruction of Russia’s chemical weapons programme is a major milestone in the achievement of the goals of the Chemical Weapons Convention. I congratulate Russia and I commend all of their experts who were involved for their professionalism and dedication. I also express my appreciation to the States Parties that assisted the Russian Federation with its destruction program and thank the OPCW staff who verified the destruction.”

The OPCW’s press statement confirmed that:

“The remainder of Russia’s chemical weapons arsenal has been destroyed at the Kizner Chemical Weapons Destruction Facility in the Udmurt Republic. Kizner was the last operating facility of seven chemical weapons destruction facilities in Russia. The six other facilities (Kambarka, Gorny, Maradykovsky, Leonidovka, Pochep and Shchuchye) completed work and were closed between 2005 and 2015.”

The OPCW’s reports on Russia confirm that the agency found no evidence of the existence of an active Novichok programme.

It should be noted that Dr. Robin M. Black, formerly of Porton Down’s Defence Science and Technology Laboratory — which reportedly confirmed the use of Novichok in the Salisbury assassination — sits on the Scientific Advisory Board of the OPCW. Yet a scientific review by Dr. Black also raised doubts about Novichok, noting that its properties and structures had not been independently confirmed.

Here is what Porton Down’s Dr Black wrote about Novichoks in a 2016 scientific review published by the Royal Society of Chemistry:

In recent years, there has been much speculation that a fourth generation of nerve agents, ‘Novichoks’ (newcomer), was developed in Russia, beginning in the 1970s as part of the ‘Foliant’ programme, with the aim of finding agents that would compromise defensive countermeasures. Information on these compounds has been sparse in the public domain, mostly originating from a dissident Russian military chemist, Vil Mirzayanov. No independent confirmation of the structures or the properties of such compounds has been published.

On the basis of this sort of analysis, the OPCW’s science board, which included Porton Down’s Dr Black as UK representative, concluded that:

“… it has insufficient information to comment on the existence or properties of ‘Novichoks.’”

So in short, the OPCW does not agree with the vague US and British insistence that Russia failed to declare all its chemical weapons stockpiles and facilities, and does not agree with the insistence that Novichok stockpiles or production facilities exist in Russia. But it seems that neither does His Excellency Peter Wilson himself.

In a statement to the OPCW in November 2017, Ambassador Wilson congratulated the OPCW on verifying the complete destruction of Russia’s chemical weapons programme with high praise for its director, Ahmet Üzümcü. Wilson listed the latter’s numerous achievements including:

“… the completion of the verified destruction of Russia’s declared chemical weapons programme.”

Yes, Wilson specified he was only talking about Russia’s “declared” programme, but he did not denounce the OPCW for failing to deal with an undeclared Novichoks programme. So how credible is his recent insinuation that the OPCW’s position is wrong?

Arguably, not very. Because the claim, tracing back to the State Department, that Russia has not declared all its chemical weapons, is based on the assertion that its Novichok capability still exists. But both Porton Down’s Dr. Black and the OPCW’s Science Advisory Board fundamentally questioned the “existence” of Novichok.

The lack of credibility of the Anglo-American critique of Russia’s destruction of its chemical weapons was called out in a detailed report by the respected Clingandael Institute of International Relations. The report, co-funded by the European Union, criticised the United States for adopting an unhelpful politicised approach to the chemical weapons issue in relation to Russia, while hypocritically delaying its own compliance obligations, all of which was done in a manner which bypassed OPCW mechanisms. It’s worth reproducing that entire text in full:

“… on a political level, there have been some drawbacks. Particularly interesting is that compliance concerns tend to be raised by the US, while this state is itself being criticized for delays in disarmament. In 2005, the US expressed concern about active offensive CW research and development (R&D) programmes, as well as inaccurate declarations regarding past CW transfers and undeclared CW facilities in Russia, China, Iran, Libya and Sudan. The US decided to address these concerns through bilateral channels, rather than directly engaging formal OPCW mechanisms. In the meantime, the US itself has been criticized for exporting arms classified as ‘toxicological agents’ (notably tear gas) to numerous countries in the Middle East (between 2009–13). Since 9/11, the US has also intensified its R&D on non-lethal chemical agents, along with new means of delivery and dispersal. The CWC (Article II, para. 2) does cover chemical compounds with incapacitating or irritant effects… Taken together with the delay in destroying US CW stockpiles, this has taken a toll on the US’ standing within the CWC, undermining its role as a ‘regime hegemon’. Since these compliance concerns remain unresolved, this has also, ipso facto, affected the authority of the CWC, and hence the OPCW.” [emphasis added]

In other words, the US did not raise its claimed concerns about Russia’s undeclared Novichoks through the proper mechanisms via OPCW, but only bilaterally. Why?

One possible explanation is that by not working through the issue with the OPCW, the US effectively circumvented the international verification process by which the Novichoks issue, if real, could be properly investigated and assessed. This has conveniently permitted the US and Britain to claim, entirely without evidence, that Russia is in non-compliance of the Chemical Weapons Convention by insisting that its Novichoks supplies and capabilities remain undeclared. Yet it is precisely the US’ own refusal to disclose and navigate the issue through the OPCW that means the matter can be made out to be forever unresolved.

The crux of it is this: At this point, neither the US nor Britain have offered any actual evidence as to why the OPCW’s verification process regarding Russia’s dismantlement of its chemical weapons capability should be disbelieved. They have provided no evidence that Russia retains any Novichok stockpiles.

The OPCW is, of course, the same agency whose independent investigations the West is relying on to determine culpability in major chemical weapons attacks in Syria. Why, then, would the OPCW’s conclusions on Syria be considered gospel truth, while its conclusions on Russia be rejected?

Not only has the press completely overlooked these kinks in the British government line, it has curiously ignored that Theresa May’s claims contradict the public statements of Mirzayanov.

Agence France Presse, for instance, declared in an opening paragraph to an interviewwith Mirzayanov, “The Russian chemist who first revealed the existence of ‘Novichok’ nerve agents says only the Russians can be behind the weapon’s use in Britain against a former spy and his daughter.” And yet, the AFP article went on to report:

“The only other possibility, he said, would be that someone used the formulas in his book to make such a weapon.”

Mirzayanov’s book, published in 2008, contains the formulas he alleges can be used to create Novichoks. In 1995, he explained that “the chemical components or precursors” of Novichok are “ordinary organophosphates that can be made at commercial chemical companies that manufacture such products as fertilizers and pesticides.”

If his claims are remotely accurate, then that means Novichoks can actually be manufactured by anyone who reads Mirzayanov’s book with access to a decent laboratory. Which means that Theresa May’s claim that Novichoks lead only to Russia is little more than a deception.

Other states have Novichok capabilities, but the British government doesn’t want to investigate them

The OPCW’s authoritative verdict on Russia’s now destroyed chemical weapons capabilities should be enough to give anyone pause for thought in rushing to judgement concerning Russian responsibility for the Novichok attack.

Instead, the British government appears to have no interest in investigating the fact that there are other state agencies with significant nerve agent capabilities. Like its ally, the United States.

Under Boris Yeltsin, who won Russian elections thanks to Western covert meddling, the Russian government had declared that it was not stockpiling Novichok. This is why Yeltsin did not report Novichok’s existence under chemical-weapons conventions at the time — because the official Russian position was that the stockpiles no longer existed.

It turns out the Americans themselves were involved in the dismantlement of Russia’s remaining Novichok capabilities.

In August 1999, as the BBC reported, US defence experts arrived in Uzbekistan to help “dismantle and decontaminate one of the former Soviet Union’s largest chemical weapons testing facilities.” The facility was known as “a major research site for a new generation of secret, highly lethal chemical weapons, known as Novichok”, and provided the US ample opportunity to learn about this nerve agent and reproduce it for testing and defence purposes.

But it is not just the US. According to Craig Murray — former US Ambassador to Uzbekistan and prior to that a longtime career diplomat in the UK Foreign Office who worked across Africa, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia — the British government itself has advanced capabilities in Novichok:

“The ‘novochok’ group of nerve agents — a very loose term simply for a collection of new nerve agents the Soviet Union were developing fifty years ago — will almost certainly have been analysed and reproduced by Porton Down. That is entirely what Porton Down is there for. It used to make chemical and biological weapons as weapons, and today it still does make them in small quantities in order to research defences and antidotes. After the fall of the Soviet Union, Russian chemists made a lot of information available on these nerve agents. And one country which has always manufactured very similar persistent nerve agents is Israel.”

But the British government doesn’t want to investigate Porton Down, not even to rule out the possibility that it may have ‘lost control’ of some of its Novichok stockpiles.

Porton Down: proudly experimenting with nerve gas on the British public from the 1950s to 1989

Perhaps the government is worried about what it might actually discover if it asks too many questions about Porton Down itself.

The facility has a somewhat chequered history in relation to the abuse of chemical and biological weapons programmes that has been largely forgotten. This history illustrates that the British government has not at all been averse to using chemical and biological weapons on its own population, just to see what happens.

Two years ago, the Independent reported on new historical research which found that during the Cold War, the British government “used the general public as unwitting biological and chemical warfare guinea pigs on a much greater scale than previously thought.”

Over 750 secret operations had been carried out on “hundreds of thousands of ordinary Britons” involving “biological and chemical warfare attacks launched from aircraft, ships and road vehicles.”

“British military aircraft dropped thousands of kilos of a chemical of ‘largely unknown toxic potential’ on British civilian populations in and around Salisbury in Wiltshire, Cardington in Bedfordshire and Norwich in Norfolk… Substantial quantities were also dispersed across parts of the English Channel and the North Sea. It’s not known the extent to which coastal towns in England and France were affected… commuters on the London underground were also used as guinea pigs on a substantially larger scale than previously thought. The new research has discovered that a hitherto unknown biological warfare field trial was carried out in the capital’s tube system in May 1964. The secret operation — carried out by scientists from the government’s chemical and biological warfare research centre at Porton Down, Wiltshire — involved the release of large quantities of bacteria called Bacillus globigii…”

The new research also shows that many of the British scientists involved “had grave misgivings about the field trials… some had long felt that it was not politically advisable to conduct large-scale trials in Britain with live bacterial agents.” Such reservations did not stop the government from authorising these dangerous experiments.

Porton Down also conducted extensive nerve agent tests on British soldiers around this time.

Less well-known, though, is the fact that members of the British armed forces “were experimented on with Sarin, the deadly nerve gas, as late as 1983 at the Government’s defence research centre at Porton Down,” according to Ministry of Defence documents obtained by The Telegraph. Operation Antler, as the police investigation into the experiments was called, found that the nerve agent trials had gone on as late as 1989.

A secret British intelligence unit is actively arranging ‘honey trap’ propaganda operations to incriminate ‘adversaries’

There are strong reasons, then, not to fall slavishly in line with the British government’s rush to judgement on Russia.

But this is particularly the case given what we now know about British intelligence service’s disinformation intent and capabilities when dealing with “adversaries.”

National Security Agency documents leaked by whistleblower Edward Snowden revealed that a secret British intelligence unit, Joint Threat Research and Intelligence Group (JTRIG), uses a range of “dirty tricks” against “nations, hackers, terror groups, suspected criminals and arms dealers that include releasing computer viruses, spying on journalists and diplomats, jamming phones and computers, and using sex to lure targets into ‘honey traps,’” according to a NBC News investigation.

Although much of the focus of these operations is online, they also include the goal of “having an impact in the real world” and “using online techniques to make something happen in the real or online world.” The modus operandi is to “destroy, deny, degrade [and] disrupt” enemies by “discrediting” them and planting misinformation designed to look like actions were performed by them.

Propaganda campaigns can use deception, mass messaging and “pushing stories” via Twitter, Flickr, Facebook and YouTube. One section of the document explains that such influence operations can involve direct efforts to manipulate people’s behaviour into compromising situations:

“Honeytrap; a great option. Very successful when it works.

– Get someone to go somewhere on the internet, or a physical location to be met by a ‘friendly face’.

– JTRIG has the ability to ‘shape’ the environment on occasions.”

Such capabilities and operations of deception at the heart of the British state raise perfectly reasonable questions about whether the UK’s intelligence services are deliberately seeking to pin the blame on Russia for geopolitical reasons — or perhaps, even, to distract from scrutiny of allies who might be legitimate suspects.

According to former British diplomat Craig Murray, for instance, it is more reasonable to cast the net of suspicion onto Israel for many of the same reasons cited by the British government:

“Israel has the nerve agents. Israel has Mossad which is extremely skilled at foreign assassinations. Theresa May claimed Russian propensity to assassinate abroad as a specific reason to believe Russia did it. Well, Mossad has an even greater propensity to assassinate abroad. And while I am struggling to see a Russian motive for damaging its own international reputation so grieviously, Israel has a clear motivation for damaging the Russian reputation so grieviously. Russian action in Syria has undermined the Israeli position in Syria and Lebanon in a fundamental way, and Israel has every motive for damaging Russia’s international position by an attack aiming to leave the blame on Russia.”

Murray further points out that it is unlikely the Russians “waited eight years to do this, they could have waited until after their World Cup.” Similarly, it makes little sense to suddenly assassinate a “swapped spy” who had already served his time and been living out in the open for years in the UK.

Murray is no blind Russiaphile, and so his critical analysis cannot be dismissed on grounds of partisanship. He describes himself as “someone who believes that agents of the Russian state did assassinate Litvinenko, and that the Russian security services carried out at least some of the apartment bombings that provided the pretext for the brutal assault on Chechnya. I believe the Russian occupation of Crimea and parts of Georgia is illegal.”

But he cautions that, given the severe lack of credible evidence on this case, he is “alarmed by the security, spying and armaments industries’ frenetic efforts to stoke Russophobia and heat up the new cold war.”

Indeed, INSURGE just reported on an extensive US Army study published last year which not only stated quite unequivocally that NATO expansionism is the main driver of Russian belligerence, but that NATO’s main interest has always been to rollback Russia’s regional influence so that the West can dominate Central Asian natural resources and oil pipeline routes.

The document recommended that in 2018, the US should consider pursuing a concerted covert “information” campaign to undermine Putin.

Army document: US strategy to ‘dethrone’ Putin for oil pipelines might provoke WW3
Senior DIA, Air Force and Army officials admit that NATO expansionism and US covert interference in Russian internal…

Is this what we are seeing play out right now as Theresa May rushes to punish Putin?

This leaves us with the following. The actual history of Novichok shows that out of the countries discussed here, Russia is the only state to have been certified by the OPCW as having destroyed its chemical weapons programme, including its nerve agent capabilities. The OPCW found no evidence to indicate that Russia retains an active Novichok capability. The same is not the case for the US, Britain and Israel.

There is no legitimate reason for the British authorities to rule out that any of these states could have at the very least ‘lost control’ of their nerve agent stockpiles. The fact that the government chose, instead, to shut down all avenues of inquiry other than to claim falsely that the “only possibility” is for all roads to lead to Russia, demonstrates that we are almost certainly in the midst of a concerted state propaganda operation.

It may turn out that Russia did indeed carry out the Novichok attack. But at this time, the British state has no real basis to presume this. Which implies that the state has already decided that it wants to manufacture a path to heightened hostilities with Russia, regardless of the evidence. And that does not bode well.

This story was 100% reader-funded. Please support our independent journalism for as little as $1 a month, and share widely.

Dr. Nafeez Ahmed is the founding editor of INSURGE intelligence. Nafeez is a 16-year investigative journalist, formerly of The Guardian where he reported on the geopolitics of social, economic and environmental crises. Nafeez reports on ‘global system change’ for VICE’s Motherboard, and on regional geopolitics for Middle East Eye. He has bylines in The Independent on Sunday, The Independent, The Scotsman, Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, Foreign Policy, The Atlantic, Quartz, New York Observer, The New Statesman, Prospect, Le Monde diplomatique, among other places. He has twice won the Project Censored Award for his investigative reporting; twice been featured in the Evening Standard’s top 1,000 list of most influential Londoners; and won the Naples Prize, Italy’s most prestigious literary award created by the President of the Republic. Nafeez is also a widely-published and cited interdisciplinary academic applying complex systems analysis to ecological and political violence.




Gilad Atzmon Needs Your Immediate Support!

Gilad Atzmon Needs Your Immediate Support!

Gilad Atzmon — March 16, 2018

gilad need support

I am being sued for libel in the High Court in England by Campaign Against Antisemitsm’s chairman Gideon Falter. I have made the decision to fight this crucial battle for freedom of expression even though this fight poses a real risk of bankrupting me and my family.
I choose to fight their suit because I believe that the CAA and its chairman and its use of libel laws pose a danger to freedom of speech and the future of this country as an open society. Enough is enough!
Mr. Falter has sued me for comments I made on my own website.
My comments were made in the context of expressing my opinion about the situation where, last July, The British Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) attested that there had been no increase in anti-Semitism in Britain, and Gideon Falter and the CAA refused to accept the CPS’s verdict. Falter and the CAA insisted that anti Semitism was on the rise. Sky news reported on the discrepancies between the findings of CPS and the CAA.

My article focused on the choice examined by Sky News between two accounts, one maintained by Falter and the CAA, an NGO that is dedicated to prosecuting antisemitism with “zero tolerance”, and the judicial approach of the CPS: a public body, subject to scrutiny and committed to impartiality.
My comments about the CAA are the basis of their lawsuit. I believe that I have the right to express my opinions on my own website: freedom of political expression is at the heart of freedom of speech. Mr. Falter claims that my criticisms of him do not amount to an opinion at all, and is seeking an order that would stop me from saying anything similar about him again, as well as paying him huge sums in libel damages and legal costs.
The CAA has contacted Jazz venues, community centres, concert halls and even overseas companies demanding that my events be cancelled. They have now escalated this battle and if they win this will ruin me financially.
I can not fund my defence alone.  I am obliged to ask every peace loving human being who cares about freedom and ethics for funds to help me defend this case. Fighting  this battle may cost tens of thousands of pounds. I am going to need some four figure donations to find the ludicrous amount required. But every single penny mounts up and please do give something.
If you have ever enjoyed my writing – join the fight. If you don’t agree with me yet support freedom of speech – my fight is your fight. If you support the right to point at the truth without being labeled ant-Semitic – this lawsuit is the battle ground,   my fight is your fight.
I appreciate any help you can give.
To support Gilad follow this link




Before Hitler: How the Germans Went Crazy for Sex

Before Hitler: How the Germans Went Crazy for Sex

Lasha Darkmoon — Darkmoon March 17, 2018

The 22-minute video featured below is based on Lasha Darkmoon’s September 2013 article The Sexual Decadence of Weimar Germany.  

Click to enlarge


¶ . . .  NO account of the Jewish Question in Germany can be complete without some mention of the tidal wave of sexual immorality that was to engulf the country during the period of the Weimar Republic (1919-1933) following World War One. This also happened to be the apogee of Jewish power in Germany. Every single sphere of major influence had now fallen under Jewish control.
Dr Karl Wiehe, in his Germany and the Jewish Question, is painstaking in the details he provides:
“Well before 1933 the Jews had taken possession of the film industry even more thoroughly than of the theater. That was understandable, because the earnings in the film industry overshadow the earnings of any other artistic activity.
The biggest step in the direction of the decline of the German cultural life [however] was taken in the field of the light entertainment genre. Here—in the genre of musical comedy and above all in revue and burlesque—frivolity and lasciviousness were to rear their ugly heads. So much so that during these years Berlin was quite correctly considered the most immoral city in the world.
It was Jews who introduced this pornographic “art form” to Germany, a debased genre completely unknown before the Great War, and so it is the Jews who can be held responsible for the general decline in morals.
The Jewish sexologists Ivan Bloch and Magnus Hirschfeld became the representatives of “sex research” camouflaged as science—a bogus science that was merely an excuse for pornography and propaganda designed to destroy the institute of marriage and the sanctity of the family.”
Wiehe provides the following useful facts and statistics:
In 1931, over 60 percent of German films were produced by Jews and 82 percent of the film scripts were written by Jewish writers, though Jews made up less than 1 percent of the German population (0.90%). A quick look at the names of directors, producers, stage managers, actors, script writers and critics, “revealed everywhere an overwhelming preponderance of Jews.”
A cursory survey of the film titles, Wiehe tells us, shows us that the Jews had only one thing on the brain: sex. Here are some typical titles: “Moral und Sinnlichkeit” (Morals and Sensuality); “Was kostet Liebe?” (What is the Price of Love); “Wenn ein Weib den Weg verliert” (When a Woman loses her Way); “Prostitution” (Prostitution); “Sündige Mutter” (Sinful Mama); “Das Buch des Lasters” (The Book of Vices).
“The sensational titles correspond to the sleazy contents,” Wiehe complains. “All wallow in filth and display with cynical frankness the vilest scenes of sexual perversion.”
Light entertainment (revue/burlesque) was a Jewish innovation. The revue theaters, all concentrated within great cities such as Berlin, were owned and run almost exclusively by Jews. Shows consisted of little more than excuses for sexual titillation involving the display of the female form in lascivious dances that were to degenerate later into striptease and scenes of public masturbation. “In these revues,” Wiehe notes indignantly, “the uninhibited sex drive surrendered itself to disgusting orgies. All life was reduced to a common denominator of lust and its satisfaction. Chastity and self-discipline were mocked as old-fashioned prejudices.”
The Jews had managed, in the space of a mere fourteen years, to bring about a major “transvaluation of values”  in Weimar Germany. The vices of the past were now its virtues. The only vice that remained was chastity.
—  §  —
¶ . . . Wiehe points out that masturbation, hitherto a hole-in-corner vice, began to be shamelessly promoted for the first time in Weimar Germany by Jewish-run organizations. He mentions Dr Max Hodan, Jewish medical officer for Berlin, and ticks him off for circulating a booklet recommending regular masturbation for the working classes.
It is worth noting that one of the world’s worst serial killers, Peter Kürten, committed all his crimes in Germany during the 1925-1930 period.
This was of course the  heyday of the Weimar Republic when the German people lay completely under Jewish domination and when the first dress rehearsal for the later Sexual Revolution of the 1960s was arguably being run.
Significantly, when asked what his primary motive for murder was, Kürten replied: “to strike back at an oppressive society.”
This was a society in which the serial killer was to become a popular icon, enough to create a whole genre of sensational sex crime literature.
—  §  —
¶ . . . British historian Sir Arthur Bryant describes throngs of child prostitutes outside the doors of the great Berlin hotels and restaurants. He adds: “Most of them—the night clubs and vice resorts—were owned and managed by Jews. And it was the Jews among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in after years.”
Arriving in Berlin during the hyperinflation crisis (1923), Klaus Mann—son of the great German novelist Thomas Mann—remembered walking past a group of dominatrices:
Some of them looked like fierce Amazons, strutting in high boots made of green, glossy leather. One of them brandished a supple cane and leered at me as I passed by. ‘Good evening, madam,’ I said. She whispered in my ear, ‘Want to be my slave? Costs only six billions and a cigarette.’
10-year-old children turned tricks in the railway stations. A group of 14-year-old Russian girls, refugees from the Red Terror in Stalin’s Communist slaughter house, managed to make a lucrative living in Berlin as dominatrices. Little girls were freely available for sex not only in child brothels and pharmacies but could be ordered by telephone and delivered to clients by taxi, like takeaway meals. Particularly bizarre were mother-and-daughter teams offering their services to the same client simultaneously. Mel Gordon writes: “One French journalist, Jean Galtier-Boissière, described, in sickly pornographic detail, the creeping horror of feeling a nine-year-old girl’s tiny, but proficient, fingers stroking his upper thigh while the broken-toothed mother covered his face with hot sucking kisses.”
—   §   —
¶ . . .  Luigi Barzini, in his social memoir The Europeans, describes the saturnalian scene in the Tingel-Tangels or sleazy bordellos of sex-crazed Berlin in the 1920s, the Golden Age of the Jews:
“I saw pimps offering anything to anybody: little boys, little girls, robust young men, libidinous women, animals. The story went the rounds that a male goose whose neck you cut at just the right ecstatic  moment would give you the most delicious frisson of all—as it allowed you to enjoy sodomy, bestiality, homosexuality, necrophilia and sadism at one stroke. Gastronomy too, as one could eat the goose afterwards.”
In October 1923, when one US dollar could buy 4.2 billion marks and six wheelbarrows of banknotes could barely buy a loaf of bread, it was said that “the most exquisite blow job to be had in Berlin never cost an American tourist more than 30 cents.”
—  §  —
¶ . . . German author Erich Kästner, writing of Weimar Berlin, was to reflect on the topography of the soul sickness that had now taken possession of the once proud city: “In the east there is crime; in the center the con men hold sway; in the north resides misery, in the west lechery; and everywhere—the decline.”
German Jewish author Stephan Zweig has much to say about homosexuality, pointing out that even in Ancient Rome—where fourteen of the first fifteen Roman emperors were homosexual—the degree of drunken depravity and public shamelessness was far less shocking than in Weimar Berlin:
Bars, amusement parks, honky-tonks sprang up like mushrooms. Along the entire Kurfürstendamm powdered and rouged men sauntered and they were not all professionals; every high school boy wanted to earn some money and in the dimly lit bars one might see government officials and men of the world of finance tenderly courting drunken sailors without any shame. Even the Rome of Suetonius had never known such orgies as the pervert balls of Berlin, where hundreds of men costumed as women and hundreds of women as men danced under the benevolent eyes of the police. In the collapse of all values a kind of madness gained hold. Young girls bragged proudly of their perversion; to be sixteen and still under suspicion of virginity would have been a disgrace.” 
¶ . . . My own impression, though I could well be mistaken here, is that Weimar Germany can be seen as a trial run or dress rehearsal for the Sexual Revolution of the 1960s, a revolution in attitudes and behavior that was to convulse America and then spread like a moral virus to Europe and the rest of the world.
Recollect that it was in Germany during the Weimar period—in 1923 to be exact—that the Institut für Sozialforschung was set up at the University of Frankfurt. Financed by the Argentian Jew Felix Weil, this was later to become the infamous Frankfurt School.
It is my own hypothesis that the Germans were to be the initial guinea pigs of these Cultural Marxists, all of them initially Jewish apart from Habermas. These were revolutionaries intent on complete social control by the imposition of their Marxist worldview on the rest of society. It is self-evident that there is no other way to get control of a society with strong moral values than to weaken those values. The formula is simple: destroy the belief system on which that society is founded, especially its religion and its traditional codes of honor and decency. Promote godlessness and a philosophy of despair. To put it in even plainer language: reduce men to beasts if you wish to control them.
It was George Lukács, one of the founding fathers of the Frankfurt School, who had called for “a culture of pessimism and a world abandoned by God.” And it was one of their most fanatical ideologues, Willi Munzenberg, who had said he wanted to turn the world upside down and make life a hell on earth. His exact words:
We must organize the intellectuals and use them TO MAKE WESTERN CIVILIZATION STINK! Only then, after they have CORRUPTED ALL ITS VALUES AND MADE LIFE IMPOSSIBLE, can we impose the dictatorship of the proletariat. 
With Jewish intellectuals like this at the helm, doing their utmost to promote moral anarchy and create an Orwellian dystopia, is it any wonder that the Germans went helter-skelter down the slippery slope and ended up where they did?

VIDEO: 22 mins





Any pictures of Sergei Skripal in hospital?

Russia’s EU ambassador, Vladimir Chizhov has suggested that the UK research laboratory at Porton Down could be the source of the nerve agent used in the attack on Sergei Skripal.

Chizhov said Russia did not stockpile the poison, Novichok, and that the Porton Down lab was only eight miles (12km) from Salisbury, where Sergei Skripal lived.

Chizhov said that the scientists who invented Novichok are currently living in the UK.

Russia spy row: UK lab could be poison source

Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova has said that the most likely source of the nerve agent was Britain, or the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Sweden or the United States.

Russia spy row: UK lab could be poison source

‘Between 1961 and 1966 Mr Nyman, who was employed at Porton Down, received 19 injections which he was told were immunisations. They included doses of anthrax, smallpox, polio and bubonic plague.’ 


Porton Down has murdered lots of people.’

Were we lied to about Russia and Ukraine?

Maidan icon Savchenko faces arrest after claiming top anti-Russian Ukraine official ‘led snipers to central Kiev’.

Former UK ambassador Craig Murray writes:

“I have now received confirmation from a well placed FCO (UK government Foreign Office) source that the UK’s Porton Down scientists are not able to identify the nerve agent as being of Russian manufacture.”

Of A Type Developed By Liars


What about MOSSAD?

“Israel has a clear motivation for damaging the Russian reputation so grievously. Russian action in Syria has undermined the Israeli position in Syria and Lebanon.”

Skripal, Novichok, Russia, Israel, Syria, MI6 and Salisbury

Writing in The Sunday Times, about the poisoning of Sergei Skripal, Andrew Gilligan and Tony Allen-Mills write:

“Why deploy the one weapon that would instantly identify the Kremlin as the number one suspect in the case?”

Gilligan and Allen-Mills remind us that the UK government has refused to investigate the laundering, in the UK, of certain stolen Russian money.

Sergei Skripal: the spy who came into the cul‑de‑sac .

Andrew Gilligan

It was Andrew Gilligan who was sacked by the BBC, and threatened with death, after he suggested that a UK government document on Iraq had been ‘sexed up’.

Jeremy Corbyn

In an article in the Guardian, the UK Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn says that “a connection to Russian mafia-like groups” cannot be excluded.

Corbyn draws a link with the Iraq War – a result he says of “dodgy dossiers”.

Nia Griffith

The UK Labour Party’s Shadow Defence Secretary is Nia Griffith, a fervently pro-Israel lesbian.

Nia Griffith blames Putin for the poisoning of Skripal.

The UK Foreign Secretary (partly Jewish) Boris Johnson and Lord Rothschild.

The more intelligent members of the public, in letters to the media, support Corbyn.

Letters: Corbyn was right to hesitate before condemning Russia – HeraldScotland

In The Herald, John Inglis writes:

“Why has the British Government refused to show the evidence to the Russians when asked? …

“It is shocking to discover that Russian oligarchs have donated to the Conservative Party…” 

A giant psy-op in Salisbury?

David J Crawford writes:

“I read that the centre that was trying to manufacture the new class of chemical weapons was in Uzbekistan not Russia and that following the collapse of the USSR the facility was dismantled under the watchful eye of the United States. 

The other imponderable is how our experts at Porton Down, our own chemical weapons facility, can be so certain of the provenance of the incriminated toxic substance without verifiable samples to compare it with.”



William Burns writes:

“I cannot get to grips with the idea that Russian secret services would try to bump off the former spy Sergei Skripal with a poisoning agent knowing it would be like leaving a calling card, implicating them directly, when they could have done it in numerously more efficient ways…

Could this be but another distraction to build up support in the propaganda battle against Russia for supporting President Assad and the Arab Socialist Ba’ath Party in Syria?

“It seems more likely to me that British agents were behind the attack in an attempted publicity murder of Vladimir Putin.”


Sergei Skripal was poisoned in Salisbury.

Myra Forde’s Salisbury brothel (above), within the WILTSHIRE police district.

Myra Forde made allegations that she had supplied rent boys to former UK Prime Minister Sir Edward Heath.

Edward Heath had a home in Salisbury in Wiltshire
In 2011, Wiltshire’s Deputy Chief Constable David Ainsworth, was found hanged in his home.


Ronald Maddison who died an unlawful death at Porton Down

Russia did once have the nerve agent ‘Novichok, but, “it is no longer produced and the destruction of its stockpiles has been verified by international observers.”

False Flags for Newbies

“The British secret services … poisoned Skripal and his daughter using a nerve agent obtained from Britain’s military research base at Porton Down in order to obtain an excuse to compromise the World Cup games in Russia this summer and also to create a scandal immediately before the Russian presidential election.”

False Flags for Newbies

And, the purpose of the Skripal poisoning is to get more money spent on Porton Down?

The UK is now to build a new £48m chemical weapons defence centre at Porton Down.

‘Every laboratory in the West, inclusing Porton Down, has samples of the ‘Novichok’ nerve agent’ .

And, Skripal may have known too much about the Kosher Nostra?

Might the UK government want to kill some people off?

More than 10,000 extra people died in the first few weeks of 2018 than is usual for the time of year.

Experts say the additional deaths in England and Wales are not the result of flu or bad weather.

Health officials have acknowledged the 12 per cent rise but have so far given no indication of any possible causes.

dailymail. Mystery over 12 percent rise in Brit fatalities in 2018.

Sergei Skripal was struck down near to the UK government’s Porton Down labs.

The UK government has a history of using nerve gases to kill British and other people.

At the UK government’s Porton Down labs, over many years, unsuspecting ‘volunteers’ were exposed to nerve gases and other killer poisons.

Many people died hideous deaths.


In 1963, thousands of members of the British public were hit by government scientists who released a ‘plague-like’ germ on the London Underground railway, at Colliers Wood station.


‘Rex Tillerson blames Russia for the poisoning of its former spy Sergei Skripal at a British pizza restaurant – something Trump has not done.’

So, Trump dramatically FIRED Rex Tillerson as secretary of state and replaced him with CIA boss Mike Pompeo.

In Salisbury in the UK, Sergei Skripal was reportedly attacked by a nerve agent.

In the UK parliament, Theresa May explained: 

1. The UK’s Porton Down laboratory says it has identified the nerve agent as being Novichok.

2.  Russia is known to have manufactured Novichok (according to a whistleblower)
(Other countries have also manufactured Novichok. Porton Down may have its own Novichok.)
3. The Government has concluded that “it is highly likely that Russia was responsible for the act against Sergei and Yulia Skripal.”

Russia dismisses Theresa May’s ultimatum over chemical attack as “circus show”

Theresa May has a home in Sonning, west of London,

For 35 years, the village of Sonning was home to ‘Mossad agent’ Uri Geller.



The senior MI6 officer who looked after Sergei Skripal also looked after Boris Berezovsky and Alexander Litvinenko.

Both Litvinenko and Berezovsky were murdered.


MI6 is said to work closely with Mossad.

In its Dec. 30, 1996 issue, Forbes Magazine accused Berezovsky of having numerous mafia connections. 

Sergei Sokolov (above) was Boris Berezovsky’s head of security.

According to Sokolov, Berezovsky was murdered by the Western security services because he was about to hand Putin the evidence of a plot involving leading oligarchs to topple Putin in a coup.


Sokolov says: ‘I knew that Boris was in close relations with MI6, Mossad and the CIA.

‘When he became dangerous for their recruited residents such as Russian politicians and oligarchs, the Western secret services decided to get rid of him.



Litvinenko reportedly had links to the Israel-based Russian Jewish mafia and the smuggling of radioactive materials.


The poisoning of Sergei Skripal may be linked to the Jewish Mafia?

Sergei Skripal was close to an intelligence expert linked to the story of ‘Trump and the Golden Shower’.

Donald Trump has visited a  nightclub called The Act, where  shows have featured bestiality, sadomasochism and a ‘golden shower’ routine

The nightclub is in the Sheldon Adelson-owned Palazzo hotel, in Las Vegas.


Aras AgalarovTrump’s Azerbaijan business associate Aras Agalarov reportedly has knowledge of compromising information about Trump. Trump does business in Russia – McClatchy Washington Bureau.

In 2013, Trump visited The Act nightclub with the son of Russian billionaire oligarch Aras Agalarov, who also met Trump in Vegas.

Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin’s War on America and the Election of Donald Trump.

In Las Vegas, Trump had dinner with Aras Agalarov, British music executive Rob Goldstone and Trump lawyer Michael Cohen.



Sergei Skripal was close to an intelligence expert who worked for Christopher Steele.

Christopher Steele claimed that Trump was involved in sexual activity in Moscow, including a Golden Shower.

Poisoned Russian spy Sergei Skripal was close to consultant who was linked to the Trump dossier


Is there a tape showing the Golden Shower?

The BBC’s Washington correspondent is Paul Wood.

He wrote: “I got a message back that there was ‘more than one tape’, ‘audio and video’, on ‘more than one date’, in ‘more than one place’ – in the Ritz-Carlton in Moscow and also in St Petersburg – and that the material was ‘of a sexual nature’.”

Donald Trump has had a business partner, Tevfik Arif, who was prosecuted for trafficking underage girls.

Sergei Skripal

Sergei Skripal’s fellow Russian exile Valery Morozov has told Channel 4 News that Sergei Skripal was not retired, and remained in contact with military intelligence officers at the Russian Embassy.


David Kelly

In 2003, the British government biological weapons expert David Kelly was allegedly murdered after revealing that the British government had lied about Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction.

There have been 41 deaths among workers at the top secret chemical research establishment at Nancekuke, in Cornwall, which has produced deadly Sarin B nerve gas for the UK government.

Nancekuke has supplied nerve gas to Porton Down, which is near Salisbury, where Sergei Skripal was poisoned.

Deaths at UK nerve gas plant | The Independent


First Recorded Successful Novichok Synthesis was in 2016 – By Iran, in Cooperation with the OPCW 

First Recorded Successful Novichok Synthesis was in 2016 – By Iran, in Cooperation with the OPCW 

The line that novichoks can only be produced by Russia is now proven to be a complete lie. As I previously proved by referencing their publications, in 2013 the OPCW scientific advisory committee note the evidence was sparse that novichoks had ever been successfully produced, and that was still the line being published by Porton Down in 2016. You can find the hard evidence of all that here.

I have now been sent the vital information that in late 2016, Iranian scientists set out to study whether novichoks really could be produced from commercially available ingredients. Iran succeeded in synthesising a number of novichoks. Iran did this in full cooperation with the OPCW and immediately reported the results to the OPCW so they could be added to the chemical weapons database.

This makes complete nonsense of the Theresa May’s “of a type developed by Russia” line, used to parliament and the UN Security Council. This explains why Porton Down have refused to cave in to governmental pressure to say the nerve agent was Russian. If Iran can make a novichok, so can a significant number of states.

While Iran acted absolutely responsibly in cooperating with the OPCW, there are a handful of rogue states operating outwith the rule of international law, like Israel and North Korea, which refuse to ratify the Chemical Weapons Convention, join the OPCW or destroy their chemical weapons stocks. Russia has cooperated in the OPCW destruction of all its chemical weapons stocks, completed last year, which included regular OPCW inspection of all the sites alleged to have been in the original “novichok” programme. Why nobody is even looking at the rogue states outwith the OPCW is a genuine puzzle.

Extraordinarily, only yesterday the Guardian was still carrying an article which claimed “only the Russian state” could make a novichok. Despite the lying propaganda regurgitated by virtually every corporate and state “journalist”, in truth is it is now proven beyond dispute that “of a type developed by Russia” has zero evidential value and is a politician’s weasel phrase designed deliberately to mislead the public. The public should ask why.


On Not Being Refuted 

On Not Being Refuted 

Several million people have now read my articles on the lack of evidence of Russian government guilt for the Salisbury attack. That’s over 300,000 unique visitors on this little blog alone so far, and it has been repeated on hundreds of sites all over the internet. My own tweets on the subject have been retweeted over 12,500 times and received 8 million impressions. I know that journalists from every mainstream media outlet you can mention have seen the material, because of numerous tweets from them none of which address any of the facts, but instead call me a “Conspiracy nutter” or variants of that, some very rude.

Yet what I wrote has not been refuted. It would be very easy to refute were it not true. The government would just have to say “Porton Down have stated that they have definitely identified the nerve agent as made in Russia”. They have not said that. Most extraordinarily, not one mainstream media “journalist” has asked a minister the question: “You keep using this phrase the nerve agent is “of a type developed by Russia”. Are you able to confirm it was actually made in Russia?” .

There is no excuse for this. Literally hundreds of mainstream media “journalists” have slavishly reproduced the propaganda phrase “of a type developed by Russia” without a single one of them every querying this rather odd wording, or why it is the government always uses that precise wording again and again and again.

It goes without saying that not a single mainstream media “journalist” has reported that fact either that until recently Porton Down believed that “novichoks” had probably never actually been synthesised successfully and that the OPCW has never banned them on the grounds that there was no evidence of their physical existence.

Finally I wish to repeat these important facts:

1) Israel has major undeclared stocks of chemical weapons
2) Israel is one of a handful of countries, including North Korea, not to ratify the Chemical Weapons Convention and commit to destroy its chemical weapons
3) Israel is not a member of the OPCW and refuses to declare its chemical weapon stocks to the OPCW.

These are also facts you will never, ever see reported in mainstream media and entirely predictably the corporate lickspittles of the mainstream media have been out in force on socal media justifying their refusal to act on any of the information I have given on the grounds I am an “anti-semite”. A more extreme example of using any criticism of Israel to allege anti-semitism is hard to conceive.

The contribution of Jewish people to human development in fields including science, literature, music, art and commerce has been simply magnificent and utterly disproportionate to their numbers. The genocidal policy of Israel towards the Palestinians these last seventy years, and its rogue state status as regard chemical and nuclear wmds is a completely different question, for which I in no way blame the generality of Jewish people. In fact my position on this is the opposite of a BDS position. I actually want Israel to join OPCW, be a full member and cooperate in the destruction of its chemical weapon stocks.

I think I might now have a vodka. Of a type developed by Russia. Made in Warrington.


#Skripal: When it comes to a motive, this I can believe, “UK lab could be poison source” says ambassador

Uprootedpalestinians's Blog

Russia hints UK lab was nerve agent source


Vladimir Chizhov

Russia’s EU ambassador has suggested a UK research laboratory could be the source of the nerve agent used in the attack on an ex-spy and his daughter

Vladimir Chizhov told the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show that Russia had “nothing to do” with the poisoning in Salisbury of Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia.

He said Russia did not stockpile the poison and that the Porton Down lab was only eight miles (12km) from the city.

The government dismissed his comments as “nonsense.”

Retired military intelligence officer Mr Skripal, 66, and Yulia, 33, remain critically ill in hospital after being found slumped on a bench in Salisbury city centre on 4 March.

UK Prime Minister Theresa May told MPs that personnel from the Defence Chemical Biological Radiological and Nuclear Centre at Porton Down in Wiltshire had identified the substance used on them…

View original post 106 more words


Sergei #Skripal – The Emerging Picture of Theresa May’s Desperate Government

A good article with one serious flaw. Writers keep saying that this is like Blair’s Dodgy Dossier, or Powell’s UN speech. It is neither. It is exactly like the anthrax attacks in late 2001 where the finger was pointed at Iraq and the media and government said the anthrax was the same type produced in Iraq. There was very little fanfare about the eventual discovery that the spores were produced and sent from US government biological laboratories.

Uprootedpalestinians's Blog

Sergei Skripal – The Emerging Picture of a Desperate Government

By True Publica,

The pieces of this entire story are slowly coming together. The picture that is emerging is erroneous and spurious at best, at worst, its shows a desperate government at work to save itself from a chaotic implosion. 

The existence of the so-called Novichok (Russian for Newcomer) chemical agent was originally manufactured at the height of the Cold War in the 1970s and 80s and disclosed as a chemical weapon by Russia in 1993. Russia joined the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction in 1997. Russia has since (unlike the U.S.) destroyed all left over stocks from the Soviet Union chemical weapon program. This was confirmed in a NYT article of September last year. Putin himself made quite a public affair of the destruction of…

View original post 1,429 more words

A topnotch site

CO2 is Life

The Definitive Source for Exposing the Global Warming Hoax

Shooting the Messenger

As dissed on Fox News

Fabrication in BBC Panorama 'Saving Syria’s Children'

Analysis of the 30 September 2013 BBC Panorama documentary 'Saving Syria's Children' and related BBC News reports, contending that sequences filmed by BBC personnel and others at Atareb Hospital, Aleppo on 26 August 2013 purporting to show the aftermath of an incendiary bomb attack on a nearby school are largely, if not entirely, staged.


ARTICLES IN THE NEWS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . COMMENTS, FEEDBACK, IDEAS

Historical Tribune

The Factual Review

Desultory Heroics

A Chronicle of Dystopia and Resistance

Astute News

The Science Of News And Analysis

Taking Sides

Thinking Through and Against Received Opinion

The Last Refuge

Rag Tag Bunch of Conservative Misfits - Contact Info:

Citizen WElls

Obama eligibility, Obama news

Burst Updates

Burst Updates, an explosion of news, politics, and opinions.

tomfernandez28's Blog

A topnotch site

The Free

blog of the post capitalist transition.. Read or download the novel here + latest relevant posts

John Laurits

Insurgent journalism. Poetry. Weaponized Mathematics.

Hwaairfan's Blog

"We are all pieces of the puzzle of Truth, one piece missing and our self image is incomplete...Tawhid! !..."

Jim Campbell's

"A wise man can learn more from a foolish question than a fool can learn from a wise answer."~ Bruce Lee - by F. Kaskais

Web Investigator.KK. org... is one web investigative resource for searching thousands of online sources, and public databases. This blog will change your life!

Johnsono ne'Blog'as

The Revolution Will Not Be Televised

Nwo Report

Nwo News, End Time, World News and Conspiracy News

Journal of People

Peasants and workers

%d bloggers like this: