July 9, 2017
Proof the Protocols of Zion
are authentic is most of it has come true.
World government is their “Super State.”
The Protocols of Zion are required reading for anyone who wishes to understand the world in which we live. They exhibit a pathological hatred for non-Jews, and a desire to undermine and exploit them.The Protocols
were part of an “initiation” for 33 degree Masonic Jews. Most Jews are unaware of this agenda and therefore are easily manipulated. “Anti-Semitism is indispensable to us in the management of our lesser brethren.” (9)
by Henry Makow Ph.D.
(from Illuminati: The Cult that Hijacked the World)
Many people think “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” is anti-Semitic “hate literature” and a fraud.
Nobel Prize winner Alexander Solzhenitsyn wrote that the book exhibits “the mind of genius.” Pretty good for a hoax, wouldn’t you say?
Solzhenitsyn said it exhibits “great strength of thought and insight… Its design… (increasing freedom and liberalism, which is terminated in social cataclysm)…is well above the abilities of an ordinary mind… It is more complicated than a nuclear bomb.”
I believe the Protocols are genuine. They are lectures addressed to Jewish Freemasons (probably at the Mizraim Lodge in Paris) detailing an incredible plan to overthrow Western Civilization, subjugate mankind, and concentrate “all the wealth of the world… in our hands.” They were given as a regular series of workshops to these Masons in Paris. The author describes them as an “exposition of our programme” and often begins by saying, “Today we will discuss…”
Those who think the Protocols were delivered at the First Zionist Congress in Basel in 1897 are sadly mistaken. This is not information that the average Jew was privy to. There were over 200 delegates at that conference along with 26 members of the press.
Rabbi Ehrenpreis, (1869-1951) the Chief Rabbi of Sweden from 1910-1951, reportedly wrote in 1924: “Long have I been well acquainted with the contents of the Protocols, indeed for many years before they were ever published in the Christian press. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion were in point of fact not the original Protocols at all, but a compressed extract of the same. Of the 70 Elders of Zion, in the matter of origin and of the existence of the original Protocols, there are only ten men in the entire world who know.” (Quoted without source online in “1001 Quotations About Jews.”)
This “compressed extract” is confirmed by the widespread use of ellipsis–indicating words have been left out. Researchers have speculated that Adam Weishaupt, Theodore Herzl or Asher Ginzberg penned the Protocols. At first, I thought it was Meyer Amschel Rothschild (1744-1844) himself. Later I thought it might be Lionel Nathan Rothschild (1809- 1879) or James de Rothschild (1792-1868) or Adolphe Cremieux (1796-1880.) It’s hard to pinpoint because I think this document was revised by different hands.
Protocols 20-23, the “financial programme… the crowning and the decisive point of our plans” is the reason I think the author was a banker and probably a Rothschild. These lectures require a detailed knowledge of finance and profound psychological insight. Moreover the author states that all power ultimately will reside in the “King of the Jews,” which is how the Rothschilds were known. As you read this, it will be evident that much of this programme has taken effect.
Protocol One Refers to the plan as “our system.” Says men are governed “by force”: “By the law of nature, right lies in might.” Most men are willing to betray their fellow man for profit. (The “end justifies the means” is the Communist motto.) The promise of “freedom” (i.e. liberalism, reform, revolution) is used to take power from the Old Order (monarch, landed aristocracy, church, army) and transfer it to our hands, the power of “Gold” and the despotism of Capital which is entirely in our hands.”
The State is dependent on us, or it “goes to the bottom.” If the state can be ruthless in subjecting an external foe, surely an “internal foe” i.e. Masonic Jews, who are “the destroyer of society and the commonweal” are justified in using any form of subterfuge. Morality is an obstacle to successful conquest and a liability to any political leadership.
The goal is to “scatter to the winds all existing forces for order and regulation” and to become the “sovereign lord” of those so stupid as to lay down their powers and fall for liberal entreaties. Their power is “more invincible” by virtue of “remaining invisible” until insurmountable. This is a “strategic plan from which we cannot deviate” or risk “seeing the labour of many centuries brought to naught.”
“Our countersign is–Force and Make-believe” i.e. deception. The writer emphasizes that the goal is to “seize the property of others” and “bring all governments into subjection to our super government.”
The words “Liberty, Fraternity, Equality” were “baits” the Masonic Jews used “from ancient times” to overthrow “the genealogical aristocracy of the goyim” which was the peoples’ only defence. It will be replaced by the “aristocracy of money.”
Throughout history they have played upon the greed, lust and vanity of men to ensnare their agents. In other words, “democracy” is a perfect instrument for their covert control. Monarchs were much harder to subvert. Democracy, the “replacing of representatives of the people” has “placed them at our disposal” and “given us the power of appointment.”
Protocol Two: “Wars as far as possible should not result in any territorial gains,” but should demonstrate to both sides their dependence on “our international agentur” [i.e. agents] which “possess millions of eyes ever on the watch and unhampered by any limitations whatsoever.”
This implies they control the outcome of wars and have millions of spies (Masons, Jews?) “Our international right will then wipe out national rights…” as the civil law of states rule their subjects. Gentile leaders (“administrators”) will be chosen for their strict obedience and will be run by “advisors.” The goyim “can amuse themselves until the hour strikes…”
We have implanted the false doctrines “by means of our press arousing blind confidence in these theories.” “Think carefully of the successes we arranged for Darwinism, Marxism, Nietzchism. To us Jews, at any rate, it should be plain to see what a disintegrating effect these directives have had upon the minds of the goyim.”
The Press has fallen into our hands. It fashions the thought of the people. Its role is to express and create discontent. Thanks to the Press, we have the Gold in our hands though we sacrificed many of our people. Each… in the sight of God is worth “a thousand goyim.”
Protocol Three: “We have made a gulf between the far-seeing Sovereign Power and the blind force of the people so that both have lost all meaning, for like the blind man and his stick, both are powerless apart.”
“Of States we have made gladiatorial arenas where a host of confused issues contend….” “We appear on the scene as the alleged saviours of the worker… and we suggest that he should enter the ranks of our fighting forces–Socialists, Anarchists, Communists– to which we always give support in accordance with an alleged brotherly rule (of the solidarity of all humanity) of our social masonry. The aristocracy… was interested in seeing the workers were well fed, healthy and strong. We are interested in just the opposite–in the diminution, the killing out of the goyim.”
Protocol Four:“Who and what is in a position to overthrow an invisible force? And this is precisely what our force is. Gentile masonry blindly serves as a screen for us and our objects but the plan of action of our force, even its abiding place, remains for the whole people an unknown mystery.” Freedom would be possible if it rested “upon the foundation of faith in God, upon the brotherhood of humanity, unconnected with the conception of equality, which is negated by the the very laws of creation…” “This is the reason why it is indispensable for us to undermine all faith, to tear out of the minds of the goyim the very principle of Godhead and the spirit, and to put in its place …material needs.” Goyim must have no time to think but rather must be diverted to industry and trade.
“All nations will be swallowed up in the pursuit of gain and in the race for it, will not take note of their common foe.” We must put industry on a “speculative basis” so wealth will pass to our classes. The rat race will create, no has already created “disenchanted, cold and heartless communities.” This materialism will allow us to direct the lower classes of the goyim against our rivals for power “the privileged and… the intellectuals of the goyim.”
to be continued…
July 10, 2017
“The goyim are a flock of sheep, and we are their wolves. And you know what happens when the wolves get hold of the flock?”
July 11, 2017
“The goyim enter the lodges in the hope of getting a nibble from the public pie…These tigers in appearance have the souls of sheep and the wind blows freely through their heads.” Protocol 15
The Protocols of Zion portray Freemasons as being under the thumb of
the Jews. But if you believe Voltaire’s dictum that you cannot criticize your real master, then why does Freemasonry fly under the radar, while we certainly can criticize the Jews? I suspect Satanists – non Jew and Jew — have united under the aegis of the Illuminati, against the non-Zionist Jew and “goyim.” Deserved or not, as in Nazi Germany, the assimilated Jew is being set up as potential scapegoat.
This is Part Three in a Synopsis of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Introduction and Part One are here. Part Two is here. This is required reading for anyone who wishes to understand the world in which we live. The Protocols exhibit a pathological hatred for non-Jews, and a desire to undermine and exploit them. The Protocols were part of an “initiation” for 33 degree Masonic Jews. Most Jews are unaware of this agenda and therefore are easily manipulated. “Anti-Semitism is indispensable to us in the management of our lesser brethren.” (Protocol 9)
(Press, movies, culture & entertainment are placebos controlled by the CIA, for the Illuminati)
Protocol 12 — “The majority of the public have not the slightest idea what ends the press really serves.” [After our revolution] no one shall with impunitythe infallibility of our government… among those making attacks upon us will also be organs established by us, but they will attack… points that we have pre-determined to alter. Not a single announcement will reach the public without our control.”
“…We shall set up our own opposition [press] which… will present what looks like the very antipothesis to us. Our real opponents at heart will accept this simulated opposition as their own and will show us their cards.” “We shall have a sure triumph over our opponents since they will not have at their disposition organs of the press in which they can give full and final expression of their views.”
Protocol 13 — “The need for daily bread forces the goyim to keep silence and be our humble servants.” “We further distract [the masses] with amusements, games… art, sport …from questions in which we should find ourselves compelled to oppose them. Growing more and more unaccustomed to reflect and form any opinions of their own, people will begin to talk in the same tones as we, because we alone shall be offering them new directions for thought… of course through such persons as will not be suspected of solidarity with us.” “Who will ever suspect then that all these peoples were stage-managed by us according to a political plan which no one has so much as guessed at in the course of many centuries?”
Protocol 14 — “When we come into our kingdom it will be undesirable for us that there be any other religion than ours… We must therefore sweep away all other forms of belief.” We will also expose the folly of the goy governments’ chase after “the fantastic schemes of social blessings, [i.e. socialism, communism] never noticing that these schemes kept on producing a worse and never a better state…”
“Our philosophers will discuss all the shortcomings of the various beliefs of the goyim. But no one will ever bring under discussion our faith from its true point of view since this will be fully learned by none save ours, who will never dare to betray its secrets.”“Our wise men trained to become leaders of the goyim, will compose [materials] which will be used to influence the minds of the goyim, directing them towards such understanding and forms of knowledge as have been determined by us.”
Protocol 15 — The goy Masons are totally manipulated.
After the revolution they will disband all secret societies but until then we will “create and multiply free Masonic lodges” for there “we shall find our principal intelligence office and means of influence… and tie together …all revolutionary and liberal elements.”
(left, J. Edgar Hoover in Masonic regalia)
Thanks to Freemasonry: “The most secret political plots will be known to us and will fall under our guiding hands on the very day of their conception. Among the members… will be almost all the agents of international and national police, …in a position to use their own particular measures with the insubordinate but also to screen our activities [i.e. act on our behalf without blame attaching to us] and provide pretexts for discontents etc. [i.e. provocations]” Hence the role of police and intelligence agencies in our society. If there is a plot against us “at the end will be no other than one of our most trusted servants.”
The goy Masons are totally manipulated. “The goyim enter the lodges in the hope of getting a nibble from the public pie.” He disparages the goy Masons, “These tigers in appearance have the souls of sheep and the wind blows freely through their heads.” We have given them the “hobbyhorse” of “collectivism” even though it violates the laws of nature.
“Isn’t this proof the mind of goyim is undeveloped compared to our own? This it is, mainly, which guarantees our success.” The author talks about stopping at nothing no matter the sacrifice. He cares nothing about the “seed of the goy cattle” but the sacrifice of Jews has resulted in the betterment of the rest. We hasten the death of those who “hinder our affairs.”
“We execute masons in such wise that none save the brotherhood can ever have a suspicion of it, not even the victims themselves… they all die when required as if from a normal kind of illness. Knowing this, even the brotherhood in its turn does not protest. By such methods we have plucked out of the midst of masonry the very root of protest against our disposition.” (See “Rothschilds Murdered at Least Seven US Presidents.”)
The superior intelligence of the Chosen People confirms that “nature herself has intended us to guide and rule the world.” Describes a paternalistic despotism based on the submission of humanity to what is stronger. In relation to this power, the peoples of the world and even their governments are “only children under age.”
First Comment from Robert K:
“The need for daily bread forces the goyim to keep silence and be our humble servants.” This is the key our enslavement, which goes well with the quote you use from Upton Sinclair: “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it!”
As long as people tolerate the appropriation by the financial monopoly of the ability to mobilize humanity’s fantastic heritage of discoveries and knowhow, the world will continue to spiral down into chaos and corruption. A society truly living in the way Jesus taught that our nature is designed for–i.e., loving our neighbours, and even our enemies–would not stand for this gigantic, impoverishing larceny for one minute.
July 12, 2017
the Protocols of Zion and the destruction of higher learning and religion in the West today.
This is the fourth and final part in a Synopsis
of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Introduction
This is required reading to understand the world in which we live. The Protocols exhibit a pathological hatred for non-Jews, and a desire to undermine and exploit them. The Protocols were part of an “initiation” for 33 degree Masonic Jews. Most Jews are unaware of this agenda and therefore are easily manipulated. “Anti-Semitism is indispensable to us in the management of our lesser brethren.” (Protocol 9)
Protocol 16 — Subvert Education and Religion.
“We must introduce into their education all those principles which have so brilliantly broken up their order. But when we are in power we shall remove every kind of disturbing subject from the course of education and shall make out of the youth obedient children of authority, loving him who rules as the support and hope of peace and quiet.”
[Cf. Protocol Two- “Think carefully of the successes we arranged for Darwinism, Marxism, Nietzchism. To us Jews, at any rate, it should be plain to see what a disintegrating effect these directives have had upon the minds of the goyim.”]
“We shall erase from the memory of men all facts of previous centuries which are undesirable to us, and leave only those which depict all the errors of the government of the goyim.”
“We shall abolish every kind of freedom of instruction… teachers will read what will pass as free lectures… These theories will be raised by us to the stage of a dogma of faith as a transitional stage towards our faith.”
“We shall swallow up and confiscate to our own use the last scintilla of independence of thought… [we will] turn the goyim into unthinking submissive brutes waiting for things to be presented before their eyes in order to form an idea of them.”
“We have long past taken care to discredit the priesthood of the goyim, and thereby to ruin their mission on earth, which in these days might still be a great hindrance to us… As to other religions, we shall still have less difficulty in dealing with them…” (Thinking sexual abuse by Catholic priests?)
“The king of the Jews will be the real Pope of the Universe, the Patriarch of an international Church.” “…we shall fight against [existing churches] by criticism designed to cause schism…” (Thinking gay marriage?)
“In our programme, one third of our subjects will keep the rest under observation from a sense of duty, on the principle of volunteer service to the state.”
“Just as nowadays our brethren [i.e. Jews] are obliged at their own risk to denounce to the kahal [Jewish council] apostates of their own family… so in our kingdom over all the world it will be obligatory for all our subjects to observe the duty of service to the State…” (Thinking KGB, Stazi or Gestapo?)
Protocol 18 – frequent attempts upon the lives of goy leaders through our agents
“…we have broken the prestige of the goy kings by frequent attempts upon their lives through our agents, blind sheep of our flock, who are easily moved by a few liberal phrases to crimes provided only they be painted in political colors. We have compelled the rulers to acknowledge their weakness in advertising overt measures of secret defence and therefore we shall bring authority to destruction.”
[For example, left, Czar Alexander II was assassinated by a bomb in 1881. The Minister of Internal Affairs von Plehve was assassinated in July 1904. Peter Stolypin, the Prime Minister was assassinated in September 1911.]
Protocol 20 – “The purely brute brain of the goyim…”
This deals with the “financial programme” the “crowning and decisive point of our plans.” The author’s expertise in these matters suggests he is a banker. “When we come into our kingdom our autocratic kingdom will avoid… burdening the masses with taxes remembering that it plays the part of father and protector.”
A progressive capital tax will be introduced. “A tax increasing in the percentage of ratio to capital will give a much larger revenue than the present individual or property tax, which is useful to us now for the sole reason that it excites trouble and discontent among the goyim.”
“Economic crises have been produced by us for the goyim by no other means than the withdrawal of money from circulation.” “The issue of money ought to correspond with the growth of population…”
“The gold standard has been the ruin of the States which adopted it, for it has not been able to satisfy the demands for money, the more so that we have removed gold from circulation as far as possible.”
Goy governments can create their own currency and credit. “How clear is the undeveloped power of thought of the purely brute brains of the goyim as expressed in the fact that they have been borrowing from us… without ever thinking that these very moneys, plus an addition for payment of interest, must be got by them from their own state pockets in order to settle up with us. What could have been more simple than to take the money they wanted from their own people?”
Protocol 22 –
“In our hands is the greatest power of our day–gold… Surely there is no need to seek further proof that our rule is predestined by God? Surely we shall not fail with such wealth to prove that all that evil which for so many centuries we have had to commit has served at the end of ends the cause of true well-being–the bringing of everything into order?”
“Our Order will be the crown of order, and in that is included the whole happiness of man. The aureole of this authority will inspire a mystical bowing of the knee and a reverent fear before it of all peoples. True force makes no terms with any right, not even with that of God: none dare come near to it so as to take so much as a span away from it.”
The “King of the Jews” dynastic heir of King David will be King of the world. He will replace all existing rulers. Otherwise, the Protocols end on a curiously benign note, promising a benevolent government that ensures peace and order in exchange for total submission.
There are many nostrums like: “Unemployment is a most perilous thing for a government. For us its part will have been played out the moment authority is transferred into our hands. Drunkenness will also be prohibited by law…”
“The king of the Jews must not be at the mercy of his passions… the holy seed of David must sacrifice to his people all personal inclinations. Our supreme lord must be of exemplary irreproachability.” “Signed by the representatives of Zion, of the 33rd degree.”
Related- The Protocols are describing the Communist Conspiracy. Watch KGB Defector Yuri Bezmenov say in 1985 it has worked beyond their wildest expectations. He said America was in “a state of war” against Communist subversion and didn’t realize it.
——————-Goy Guide to World History
First Comment from James Perloff-
Thanks for republishing these excerpts over the past days. Nothing is closer to the NWO’s blueprint than the Protocols. They never get old, even after more than a century, and I don’t think a single protocol has ever been falsified. In my own study, it was the reference to Darwinism that first caught my attention; the references to presidential orders overriding constitutions and the use of sports to distract the masses were among those that most moved me toward accepting their authenticity; and the reference to vaccination (“inoculation of diseases”) sealed the deal for me.
July 13, 2017
Jewish apologists claim that the Protocols of Zion
were a direct plagiarism of this book published in 1864.
However, this universally-accepted claim
does not withstand scrutiny.
by Henry Makow Ph.D.
Next to the Bible The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is perhaps the mostly widely read book in the world.
Published in Russia in 1903, it purports to be the leaked master plan for “Jewish world domination.” It is the kind of thing that would be studied at secret workshops of an occult society.
In different ways, both Zionists and Nazis have made it synonymous with virulent anti Semitism and genocide.
But surely Jews should not be blamed for the machinations of a tiny secret society. The vast majority of Jews would disavow this master plan if they believed it existed.
Surely one can condemn all racism and genocide in the strongest possible terms and still believe theProtocols are authentic.
In my opinion, the equation with anti Semitism is really a ploy to divert attention away from this master plan.
The plagiarism claim is part of a propaganda campaign waged by conscious and unconscious collaborators in academia and the media.
THE FORGERY CLAIM
We are told that The Protocols of Zion is a hoax, a “proven forgery” concocted by the Tsarist Political Police (the Okhrana) to incite anti Semitism and discredit revolutionaries.
But the “proof” is far from convincing.
It consists of three articles published in The London Times (August 16-18, 1921) by Philip Graves.
According to Graves, Protocols is a crude, chapter-by-chapter plagiarism of Maurice Joly’s Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu (1864).
It was easy to make this claim while Joly’s book was unavailable. Napoleon III’s police confiscated it as soon as it was published.
But it is available now and I invite you to compare the two texts. In my opinion, they are entirely different in tone, content and purpose. At 140 pages,Dialogues is twice as long as Protocols. Most of it finds no echo in theProtocols.
The crux of Graves’ argument is that certain references and passages inProtocols were lifted from Dialogues. He claims there are 50 of these and produces about a dozen.
Their striking resemblance to Protocols leaves little doubt that the author did refer to the Dialogues as part of his research. He had no compunction about borrowing or reshaping a few passages that struck his fancy.
Indeed Philip Graves is “struck by the absence of any effort on the part of the plagiarist to conceal his plagiarisms.”
That’s because he had nothing to hide.
He was not Graves’ “unimportant precis-writer employed by the court or by the Okhrana” to construct a hoax.
He was a diabolical genius crafting an original work. It is simplistic and disingenuous to characterizeProtocols as a hoax.
Graves’ article smacks of a Zionist propaganda operation. Graves “expose” of Protocols appeared in August 1921 when Zionists were pressing the League of Nations to turn Palestine into a Jewish homeland under British Mandate.
Philip Graves tells the unlikely story that a “Mr. X” brought the Dialogues to him in Constantinople where he was the Times’ correspondent. Mr. X presented it as “irrefutable proof” that the Protocols are a plagiarism.
Mr. X was a White Russian, which seems incredible given the Jewish role in the Bolshevik Revolution. He claims he bought the book from, get this, “a former member of the Okhrana” who had fled to Constantinople.
In The Controversy of Zion, (Chapter 34) Douglas Reed, a Times‘ staffer at the time, provides additional background.
In May 1920, Lord Northcliffe, a part owner of The Times, printed an article about the Protocolsentitled “The Jewish Peril, A Disturbing Pamphlet, A Call for an Enquiry. ” It concluded:
“An impartial investigation of these would-be documents and their history is most desirable…are we to dismiss the whole matter without inquiry and to let the influence of such a book as this work unchecked?”
Then in May 1922 Northcliffe visited Palestine and wrote that Britain had been too hasty to promise it to the Jewish people when in fact it belonged to 700,000 Muslim Arab residents.
Mr. Wickham Steed, the editor of The Times of London in 1921 refused to print the article and Northcliffe tried to get him fired.
Somehow Steed was able to have Northcliffe declared “insane” and committed. Later Northcliffe complained he was being poisoned and died suddenly in 1922.
Douglas Reed was Northcliffe’s secretary but didn’t learn of these events until they appeared in theOfficial History of the Times in the 1950’s.
Clearly Northcliffe had offended some “big boys” when he opposed the British Mandate in Palestine. Why was it so important?
Israel is intended to be the capital of the Masonic World Government. They are already constructing the infrastructure. See “The Roots of Evil in Jerusalem.”
THE FORGERY CLAIM IN MORE DETAIL
Philip Graves and the other apologists are incorrect to claim theProtocols plagiarize the Dialogues chapter by chapter.
Graves writes that “the Seventh Dialogue…corresponds with the fifth, sixth, seventh and part of the eighth Protocol. ”
At eight pages, these Protocols are twice as long as the Seventh Dialogue.
They mostly contain material not in the Seventh Dialogue, or anywhere else. I will list a few examples from Protocol Five alone.
Protocol Five says “our kingdom will be distinguished by a despotism of such magnificent proportions” that it will “wipe out any goyim who oppose us by deed or word.”
In contrast Seventh Dialogue says, “Death, expropriation and torture should only play a minor role in the internal politics of modern states.”
Protocols Five says we “robbed [the goyim] of their faith in God” and “insinuated into their minds the conception of their own rights” thereby undermining the authority of Kings. There is nothing comparable in Dialogue Seven.
Protocol Five says, “we shall so wear down the goyim that they will be compelled to offer us international power [allowing us] gradually to absorb all State forces of the world and to form a Super-Government.” There is nothing comparable in Dialogue Seven.
Protocol Five says the “engine” of all states is “in our hands” and that engine is “Gold.” “We were chosen by God Himself to rule over the whole earth.” There is nothing comparable in Dialogue Seven.
ON THE OTHER HAND
The author of Protocols does select a few passages or references from Dialogues that appear unaltered (see Graves) or in different form.
For example, the Dialogues‘ say: ” Everywhere might precedes right. Political liberty is merely a relative idea. The need to live is what dominates states as it does individuals.”
In Protocols this becomes, “From the law of nature right lies in might. Political freedom is an idea but not a fact, and one must know how to use it [political freedom] as a bait whenever it appears necessary to attract the masses … to one’s party for the purpose of crushing another who is in authority.” (Protocols 1)
Graves leaves out the last part to make the resemblance seem greater than it is.
Dialogues (7) say, “Revolutionary ferment which is suppressed in one’s own country should be incited throughout Europe.”
In Protocols (7) “Throughout all Europe … we must create ferments, discords, hostilities.” There is no reference to suppressing these in one’s own country.
The author of Protocols is not a forger creating a hoax, but a conspirator forging an original work.
SAME GENRE, DIFFERENT CONCEPTIONS
Both books belong to the “immoral school” of political theory. Machiavelli pays homage to a long list of rulers “who are progenitors of my doctrine.” Both preach might makes right, “good” comes from evil, and the end justifies the means.
But the similarity ends there. The tone of the Dialogues is dry and theoretical. It is a debate between fictional political theorists: Montesquieu, a champion of democracy and Machiavelli, a champion of tyranny. Dialogues is considered a critique of the reign of Napoleon III.
Montesquieu asks how to quell the spirit of anarchy in society. Machiavelli prescribes a “monster called the state” which maintains a democratic artifice but is actually controlled by the “Prince.” He talks about how to suppress secret societies.
On the other hand, the tone of Protocols is frankly conspiratorial and subversive and pays homage to Lucifer. Protocols is a “strategic plan from which we cannot deviate without running the risk of seeing the labour of many centuries come to naught.” (Protocol 1)
We are struck by a sense of relevance when reading Protocols. We immediately recognize its baneful influence in today’s world. Here is a synopsis. See also “Did Rothschild Write The Protocols of Zion?” “Protocols is the NWO Blueprint” and “Protocols Dominates Our Culture” .
Since Graves’ articles, there have been a few books arguing the “forgery” thesis. The latest isNorman Cohn, Warrant for Genocide (1970).
Graves and Cohn admit that “the Financial Programme” (Protocols 20-24) which the author calls “the crowning and decisive point of our plans” is largely original.
For serious researchers, Australian researcher Peter Myers presents pro and con views.
Goebbels said that propaganda is effective only when the reader doesn’t realize it is propaganda. It follows that dupes write the best propaganda.
One hundred million people were slaughtered in the last century but no one considers the possibility that the human race might have been subverted.
War is hell but no one thinks Satan worshipers might be behind it.
I suspect the Second World War was a battle for racial superiority between Jewish and Aryan wings of the Illuminati who in fact are united at the top.
The private central bankers of England, the U.S. and Nazi Germany made the war possible. They worked as one at the Bank of International Settlements in Switzerland. (See Charles Higham, Trading With the Enemy.)
The purpose of the war was to degrade, defraud and demoralize humanity. The Holocaust provided a rationale for the establishment of Israel as headquarters of the New World Order. Aryans, Jews and many others were sacrificed and exploited.
In my opinion, the outlawing of Protocols on pain of death in Bolshevik Russia and its execration in the West today proves its authenticity.
Mankind is in the grip of a diabolical conspiracy. In order to make good people do bad things, truth must be tailored to fit the political purpose. This is Communist and feminist teaching.
I would like to be proven wrong, but in the case of Protocols, the “forgery” argument is propaganda.
Updated from Dec 14, 2003
July 15, 2017